There is a gulf of difference between making accusations ...... and having the evidence to support them!So far the US and its coalition have made many accusations but have not managed to present any tangible evidence. When they do present '
evidence' it has more holes in it than a Gruyere Cheese and is usually from a single convenient source. Try ........ 20,000 photos of
'Assad's victim's of torture' .... turned out to be 20,000 photos of unidentified dead bodies, taken in hospital morgues so that there was a record of them for future identification by relatives.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2016/03/the-caesar-photo-fraud-that-undermined-syrian-negotiations/To the contrary, every action by the US coalition in Syria has been illegal from the very start and constitutes war crimes and crimes against humanity ..... proven without a shadow of doubt. So who will we see in the dock at the ICC in the Hague? Certainly won't be the Yanks, they are an exceptional people, they are above the Law and do not recognise the ICC anyway...... unless it is convenient to their cause, but the rest of the coalition are not exceptional.
If Assad is such a monster, how come the Syrian people still elect him into power as their President after years of this so called abuse? How come it is the government controlled areas that many Syrians flee to directly they break free from the butchery of the US coalition armed and supported terrorists? Chemical weapons, bombing hospitals and schools, deliberately killing civilians, robbing aid convoys ........ are all figments of a deranged and over active imagination ....... but there are always suckers that believe these stories!