Paphitis:
I don't even know how you can even pass your opinion as a qualified one and even call it basic Physics.
Maybe in Australia you don’t consider Newtons Universal Laws of Motion as basic physics but the education I had in the UK all those years ago included it.
I am no engineer by any stretch and know very little about construction. I am however, quite a capable let's just say Physicist of sorts with my background and do have some knowledge with Aerodynamics and things like pressure waves, geometry and metal fatigue and what temperature fluctuations do to it, especially heat.
Apart from knowledge on construction, we are on a par, I am a bit rusty but the basics never leave you. Like you I can also fly an aeroplane but I don’t claim to be an expert on the subject. You decry any notion you do not understand. As you claim to be knowledgeable on aerodynamics tell me what Theorem determines that a wing cross section is normally asymmetrical? Simple if you do know anything about aerodynamics or as it is better known to me, fluid dynamics!
On top of this, you provide NO motive as to why this was an inside job. The Americans don't need to do such a thing not to mention the fact that they are not known throughout their history for false flags.
I don’t and never have subscribed to the idea that it was an inside job. I am sorry but the US (CIA) are known for their involvement in ‘
false flags’. Gulf of Tonkin Incident, and USS Liberty and the Iranian Mossadegh incidents spring to mind.
They are a superpower. They are able to do what they want. It's not as if they will be punished or even suffer sanctions.
Maybe that is the attitude that leads to all the violence in the World today and the reason so many countries despise the US? (
i.e. we do it my way or else.) “
We, the American people are the exceptional and indispensible race.” ..... Obama said so, it is a matter of record. You may worship the very ground the US walks on but you are certainly not in a majority!
No motive, and all credible engineering firms have not refuted the American reports. There are many conspiracists on the www who refute it and you might find some qualified people among them, but not one credible engineering firm, university department of engineering but just disgruntled people with a chip on their shoulder, conspiracists, and others motivated by a political agenda
.
I think B25 answered that one? Plenty of Universities have refuted the stories as have members of Professional Institutes, including those in the aviation world.
This is going nowhere. When you make accusations of murder, the first thing investigators look for is a motive. You have not even got one.
I have never provided a motive because you would not even consider it without a mountain of what you consider as irrefutable proof, in other words it has to prove you right! But give you a story that jet fuel can melt steel and cause the collapse of two buildings on the same day, and one that collapsed almost identically due to fire but no Jet A1, and you swallow it even though no such a thing has ever happened before. You never question your story or its sources. When I try to give you an explanation, you get stroppy, try to mock what you don’t understand, belittle the messenger and then throw your toys out of the pram when I won't agree with you.
As I said .... Newtons Laws of Motion are basic physics taught in all senior schools in my day . Add to that a bit of common sense and it says what we are told happened on 9/11 is not supported by the facts.
The actual attacks could well be just as you describe them ......... but their motive is not really known. I doubt it was the American way of life as by all reports the hijackers enjoyed it! I doubt it was Islam as none of them were serious practitioners. I think they just hated the USA and everything it stands for. That has brushed off on all the countries that have supported their attacks on the rest of the World and they have now become targets as well. I think a foreign invader destroying your country and the people, is a good enough motive .... at least for the terrorist attacks.
In my book the terrorist attacks and the collapse of all three towers; the reason the Pentagon was targeted and fight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania, are not part of the terrorist ‘
scenario’ .... it just piggy backed on those events and was planned and implemented years before the terrorist attacks of 911. The motive ....... firstly to prevent a catastrophe when the US realised the vulnerability of the twin towers to terrorist attack ........ and then later for financial gain ! I don’t have any proof just a feeling that fits the events to a tee.
