Paphitis wrote:Robin Hood wrote:Paphitis wrote:Yes a sick old man on dialysis is more than capable of launching such a clandestine attack.
Just like an old frail and even old bag of Bones of a man led an entire Cypriot Revolution from under a sink and had the World's Greatest then superpower (The British Military) chasing its own tail.
The American Government isn't capable, not to mention the fact that such a thing will need to be signed of by the President and there is no way any President would do this.
In addition, America is only good at fighting conventional wars. When it comes to old men in caves and on dialysis, they are not so good as the Russians also found out the hard way when they invaded Afghanistan.
That was a guerrilla war, on a tiny sparcely populated and primitive (no offence meant) island against a few hundred colonialist conscripts. Different scenario.
What I find difficult to comprehend is how a mighty power with every know means of collecting intelligence would be less capable of planning and implementing events than Al-Qaida, who are/were at the very least primitive ?
America does not fight conventional wars anymore, it gets others to fight them on their behalf!
Nobody, but nobody knows what goes on inside the White House, who signs what off is irrelevant because it would never be allowed to get into the wrong hands.
You only need to take a look at Mrs. Clinton to see just how much trouble these people will go to, to cover their tracks from the people. They live in a different world to the rest of us, there is no law for them as they are rarely bought to trial for their crimes. (Nixon is the only one I can remember ..... but didn't go to jail when found guilty) The evidence is destroyed and the witnesses have a habit of being locked away or disappearing !
Once again you bring Russia into the discussion. You haven't forgotten that the military weaponry and support the US gave to the Taliban to fight Russia, is where all this started and that eventually they morphed into Al-Qaida .....and then bred ISIS!
It's not a different scenario at all.
It is not at all unfeasable for terrorists to be able to organize such terrorists attacks.
But not the US administration, or those in the administration associated with Israeli intelligence, or those that had commercial interests in seeing the demise of WTC1, WTC 2 and WTC 7 ?
In fact I believe we are due for a much greater terrorist event in the very near future involving Chemical Weapons and we might lose more than 10,000 people. We might even lose 20,000 people or more. This is where this is going next and we already know they have the Chemical weapons to Asphyxiate all of Manhattan. It will be DAESh's last legacy and sea song to inspire the next generation in 10 years time when they suddenly reappear.
I don't mean to be alarmist, but it is inevitable and our security agencies know it too.
We are always one step behind them and generally speaking the USA, Australia and UK have been very lucky so far. France and Belgium not so.
What the American, British and Australian Intelligence Services have achieved in the last 15 years is amazing. They are obviously good and they have had so stood fortune along the way but luck has a habit of running out.
I don't have a problem with most that observation. I am sure that you could well be right ..... I see the financial thing in the same light. You have knowledge presumably on military intelligence. I have knowledge of money creation/banking. I don't question your view because I have no information/intelligence that refutes it and it is perfectly plausible.