Cyprus-Forum.com

by **DT.** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:36 am

Lordo wrote:read this you stupid idiot.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/vwTreaties1949.xsp

Is the occupation regime a signatory to the Geneva Convention? As far as I know the only connection the Geneva Convention has with the "tRNc" is that it's decrees are applicable to it as an occupied land.

by **Sotos** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 4:08 am

Lordo wrote:read this you stupid idiot.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/vwTreaties1949.xsp

Shut up you fucking idiot. Turkey invaded Cyprus and they didn't give a fuck about the Geneva Convention. They killed innocent people, raped women, killed prisoners of war, ethnically cleaned 1/3rd of Cyprus's population... and then they also brought the Settlers something which is again against the Geneva Convention. So basically it is fine for the Turkish army invading our country and violate every rule there is (and never apologize for any of that) but then when defending our country against such barbarian invaders we are supposed to play by the rules?? Why? So we can make it easier for you to take our lands without suffering any casualties? Fuck off!

by **Sotos** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 4:34 am

Jerry wrote:
Sotos wrote: I will not drop to your level to reply in kind... for now. How what I said prevents justice and peace or makes me a fascist? What I am talking about takes effect in a time of war, when our country is invaded and our people killed and raped. There is no peace or justice in such environment. What exists is war and your aim in a war is to win it. And in order to win it you have to kill as many of the enemies as possible. This is what those who fought against the Nazis and fascism did as well and this didn't prevent peace and justice between the former enemies (even though the allies never apologized for targeting Axis civilians) Don't blame me for the ugliness of war and what it takes to win one.

If you knew anything about WW2 you would know that the bombing of German cities diverted hundreds of thousands of troops and aircrew from the Russian front and later Normandy, it served a strategic purpose and hastened the end of the war. The nuclear weapons used on Japan brought WW2 to an end, it cost thousands of Japanese lives but saved thousands of allied troops theirs. Perhaps you would care to explain the strategy behind killing innocent Cypriot women and children.

By the way, you are, and always will be, below my level, in the UK you would be known as a low-life thug.

You are a low life organism... your intelligence does not pass the monkey level. When the US and UK is doing it then its fine because they give you some excuse for targeting civilians! Get Real gave you a good answer. The difference between what the US/UK have done in WWII and what we did in 1974 is that the US/UK killed a whole lot more people and therefore they were effective. Do you think the nuclear bombs would have any effect on the outcome of the war if they killed 100 odd people each? It is their ability to kill a LOT of people that made them effective. And if we had the ability to kill a LOT of Turks then I can assure you that we wouldn't lose the war and Cyprus wouldn't be occupied today. Why do you think UK, US and other countries still today have weapons of mass destruction which are made specifically to destroy whole cities? Could there be a better reason for those countries to use those weapons if an enemy invaded them and started to take their territory, killing their civilians, raping their girls and ethnically cleansing their people? They destroyed whole cities of their enemies with way less excuse than that, but when it comes to Cyprus you don't recognize our right to fight the enemy to defend ourselves and our land!

by **Sotos** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 4:42 am

So there is nothing to apologize for. We were invaded by an enemy who not only took our lands but also didn't play by the rules and not only they never apologized for any of that but they CELEBRATE their crimes against us!!

by **Jerry** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:16 am

Sotos wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Sotos wrote: I will not drop to your level to reply in kind... for now. How what I said prevents justice and peace or makes me a fascist? What I am talking about takes effect in a time of war, when our country is invaded and our people killed and raped. There is no peace or justice in such environment. What exists is war and your aim in a war is to win it. And in order to win it you have to kill as many of the enemies as possible. This is what those who fought against the Nazis and fascism did as well and this didn't prevent peace and justice between the former enemies (even though the allies never apologized for targeting Axis civilians) Don't blame me for the ugliness of war and what it takes to win one.

If you knew anything about WW2 you would know that the bombing of German cities diverted hundreds of thousands of troops and aircrew from the Russian front and later Normandy, it served a strategic purpose and hastened the end of the war. The nuclear weapons used on Japan brought WW2 to an end, it cost thousands of Japanese lives but saved thousands of allied troops theirs. Perhaps you would care to explain the strategy behind killing innocent Cypriot women and children.

By the way, you are, and always will be, below my level, in the UK you would be known as a low-life thug.

You are a low life organism... your intelligence does not pass the monkey level. When the US and UK is doing it then its fine because they give you some excuse for targeting civilians! Get Real gave you a good answer. The difference between what the US/UK have done in WWII and what we did in 1974 is that the US/UK killed a whole lot more people and therefore they were effective. Do you think the nuclear bombs would have any effect on the outcome of the war if they killed 100 odd people each? It is their ability to kill a LOT of people that made them effective. And if we had the ability to kill a LOT of Turks then I can assure you that we wouldn't lose the war and Cyprus wouldn't be occupied today. Why do you think UK, US and other countries still today have weapons of mass destruction which are made specifically to destroy whole cities? Could there be a better reason for those countries to use those weapons if an enemy invaded them and started to take their territory, killing their civilians, raping their girls and ethnically cleansing their people? They destroyed whole cities of their enemies with way less excuse than that, but when it comes to Cyprus you don't recognize our right to fight the enemy to defend ourselves and our land!

Not a reasoned response cretin. I neither applaud nor condone British and American actions in WW2, I simply (I had to keep it simple for your pea brain) said that there were strategic reasons for what they did. So again, explain the strategy behind killing innocent Cypriot women and children. To win the "war" the thugs on both sides would have been more useful killing each other rather than defenceless civilians. I've met one or two of these heroic types both here in UK and in Cyprus, they are all mouth and no balls, too scared to go to the front line they took the easy option - a bit like you and GR hiding behind your keyboards.

If you feel so strongly about the Turks go north and give them hell. :lol:

by **Get Real!** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:37 am

Jerry and Lordo skyrocket on the Corrupt-O-Meter:

1. Lordo: Peddling the Geneva conventions when it suits him! :wink:

2. Jerry: Hanging about the dockyard like a little whore to cash in from some occupied property his old man owned. :wink:

And the secret to their corrupt puny minds? Atheism… guaranteeing the moral compass of a harlot!

You shameless, uneducated little bait worms! :lol:

by **Sotos** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 12:00 pm

Read again what I wrote idiot: "If we were able to kill millions of them then Cyprus wouldn't be occupied today. The problem is that we killed too few of them." So yes, killing just 100 of them was ineffective. If we were able to kill a lot of them then Cyprus wouldn't be occupied. I am making no claims of bravery here. I am stating a simple FACT which your little brain can't process: That if we had the power to kill a lot of Turks then we would have won the war. The Turkish invasion was not a just cause for the Turks, and the Turks didn't play by the rules. So why should we apologize for anything we did in that war when the Turks CELEBRATE their crimes against us? Fuck you!

by **Jerry** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:45 pm

Sotos wrote:Read again what I wrote idiot: "If we were able to kill millions of them then Cyprus wouldn't be occupied today. The problem is that we killed too few of them." So yes, killing just 100 of them was ineffective. If we were able to kill a lot of them then Cyprus wouldn't be occupied. I am making no claims of bravery here. I am stating a simple FACT which your little brain can't process: That if we had the power to kill a lot of Turks then we would have won the war. The Turkish invasion was not a just cause for the Turks, and the Turks didn't play by the rules. So why should we apologize for anything we did in that war when the Turks CELEBRATE their crimes against us? Fuck you!

Because we are better than them. We don't lower ourselves to their disgusting standards.

by **Jerry** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:51 pm

Get Real! wrote:Jerry and Lordo skyrocket on the Corrupt-O-Meter:

1. Lordo: Peddling the Geneva conventions when it suits him!

2. Jerry: Hanging about the dockyard like a little whore to cash in from some occupied property his old man owned.

And the secret to their corrupt puny minds? Atheism… guaranteeing the moral compass of a harlot!

You shameless, uneducated little bait worms!