GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:
This invasion (July, 1974), the previous invasion(1964) and the subsequent invasion (August, 1974) were neither legal nor obligatory (nasty joke, huh) since the TCs pulled out of the 1960 Treaty in 1963.
Intervention may have been legal according to that Treaty, as the Council qualified, BUT, the treaty had been nullified. So by legal and logical deduction ALL three Turkish invasions were and are STILL illegal!
Oh that stupid judge didn't take your claims into account, huh? The truth is that the treaty has been nullified in your dreams only.
Turkey had an obligation to intervene and save the lives of TCs and communists that were arrested by eoka b gang members.
Which "stupid judge"? The Turkish one?
You really should stop acting like a brainwashed Turk if you want us to believe you are something else.
The reality is that the ILLEGAL INVASION (your choice of word) is STILL an illegal occupation.
Here are a few reasons why Turkey's actions are of warmongering and not peace:
1) the TCs nullified the 1960 Constitution by walking out. Turkey had no rights to a voice in Cyprus.
2) Turkey rubber-stamped this TC-nullification when it tried to invade in 1964 and was told to piss off by the USA.
3) the UN security council rewrote the "measures" (1964) which would be taken to maintain peace on Cyprus. These did not include ANY action by Turkey!
You will find no legal document which says "Turkey had an obligation" to invade.
Darling,
it wasn't an invasion..The nice turks just "intervened to restore the constitution. .its just taking a little longer than anticipated
The turks are struggling a little to understand the concept of democracy