mistermax wrote:In Resolution 573, the Council of Europe supported the legality of the Turkish invasion as per Article 4 of the Guarantee Treaty of 1960, .....
Which Turkish invasion?
mistermax wrote:In Resolution 573, the Council of Europe supported the legality of the Turkish invasion as per Article 4 of the Guarantee Treaty of 1960, .....
GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:In Resolution 573, the Council of Europe supported the legality of the Turkish invasion as per Article 4 of the Guarantee Treaty of 1960, .....
Which Turkish invasion?
mistermax wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:In Resolution 573, the Council of Europe supported the legality of the Turkish invasion as per Article 4 of the Guarantee Treaty of 1960, .....
Which Turkish invasion?
I mean the turkish intervention that followed the Greek Invasion (as the president of Cyprus named it). Well spotted though, my mistake.
GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:In Resolution 573, the Council of Europe supported the legality of the Turkish invasion as per Article 4 of the Guarantee Treaty of 1960, .....
Which Turkish invasion?
I mean the turkish intervention that followed the Greek Invasion (as the president of Cyprus named it). Well spotted though, my mistake.
Indeed, it wasn't 'any' mistake.
But I ask you again, to which Turkish invasion were you referring?
mistermax wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:mistermax wrote:In Resolution 573, the Council of Europe supported the legality of the Turkish invasion as per Article 4 of the Guarantee Treaty of 1960, .....
Which Turkish invasion?
I mean the turkish intervention that followed the Greek Invasion (as the president of Cyprus named it). Well spotted though, my mistake.
Indeed, it wasn't 'any' mistake.
But I ask you again, to which Turkish invasion were you referring?
I was referring to legal and obligatory military intervention of 20/7/1974.
GreekIslandGirl wrote:
This invasion (July, 1974), the previous invasion(1964) and the subsequent invasion (August, 1974) were neither legal nor obligatory (nasty joke, huh) since the TCs pulled out of the 1960 Treaty in 1963.
Intervention may have been legal according to that Treaty, as the Council qualified, BUT, the treaty had been nullified. So by legal and logical deduction ALL three Turkish invasions were and are STILL illegal!
mistermax wrote:forever
mistermax wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:
This invasion (July, 1974), the previous invasion(1964) and the subsequent invasion (August, 1974) were neither legal nor obligatory (nasty joke, huh) since the TCs pulled out of the 1960 Treaty in 1963.
Intervention may have been legal according to that Treaty, as the Council qualified, BUT, the treaty had been nullified. So by legal and logical deduction ALL three Turkish invasions were and are STILL illegal!
Oh that stupid judge didn't take your claims into account, huh? The truth is that the treaty has been nullified in your dreams only.
Turkey had an obligation to intervene and save the lives of TCs and communists that were arrested by eoka b gang members.
Lordo wrote:so perhaps you can explain to us dear oracle if the treat is indeed nullified, why on earth did the greak fo yesterday announce that there is no need for any gurantees in cyprus. according to you they are not there.
Return to Cyprus Problem Solution Proposals
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests