Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
Lordo wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
ofcourse it is not justified to kill any civilians. the question is not one of justification but one of responsibility and where it begins and where it ends. only a fool would look at this situation and just blame one thing. in fact it turns out this young man had given a lot of money to his family just before the attack. somebody mentioned fighting fire with fire, and that is exactly what isil is doing too. they are fighting the west with western methods where money corrupts everyone including the old fool.
long live western way of life.
miltiades wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
I agree entirely with your statement. This act is reprehensible, regardless of motives behind it.
Indiscriminate and premeditated, cold blooded murder committed by a psychopath .
Schnauzer wrote:miltiades wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
I agree entirely with your statement. This act is reprehensible, regardless of motives behind it.
Indiscriminate and premeditated, cold blooded murder committed by a psychopath .
If one wished to illustrate an 'Indiscriminate and Premeditated' attack upon innocents, one could find no finer example than the unlawful cold-blooded murderous assault upon the sleeping civilians of Iraq.
If you have forgotten OR.. are unable to associate the actions with that which NOW takes place in retaliation to the initial and subsequent scenarios, you are really not qualified to reach the conclusions you proffer so adamantly.
THIS particular atrocity (and atrocity it was), can only be viewed as an act of desperation committed by a person who (unlike yourself) was convinced that his action would provide a 'Graphic example' of what a heap of mutilated innocent victims looks like.
Unfortunately, no such visible evidence is available of the carnage which took place when Iraq was unlawfully and murderously attacked.
As the song says...."This is where it all began".
miltiades wrote:Schnauzer wrote:miltiades wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
I agree entirely with your statement. This act is reprehensible, regardless of motives behind it.
Indiscriminate and premeditated, cold blooded murder committed by a psychopath .
If one wished to illustrate an 'Indiscriminate and Premeditated' attack upon innocents, one could find no finer example than the unlawful cold-blooded murderous assault upon the sleeping civilians of Iraq.
If you have forgotten OR.. are unable to associate the actions with that which NOW takes place in retaliation to the initial and subsequent scenarios, you are really not qualified to reach the conclusions you proffer so adamantly.
THIS particular atrocity (and atrocity it was), can only be viewed as an act of desperation committed by a person who (unlike yourself) was convinced that his action would provide a 'Graphic example' of what a heap of mutilated innocent victims looks like.
Unfortunately, no such visible evidence is available of the carnage which took place when Iraq was unlawfully and murderously attacked.
As the song says...."This is where it all began".
The mentally unstable barbarian who perpetrated this gruesome act used the same logic as you are now displaying. You are prone to act in a similar fashion and you, Lordo and GR, apologists to this horrific act , ought to be rounded up and questioned, since you lot are a fucking menace to civilization and ideal candidates to commit similar acts.
miltiades wrote:Lordo wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
ofcourse it is not justified to kill any civilians. the question is not one of justification but one of responsibility and where it begins and where it ends. only a fool would look at this situation and just blame one thing. in fact it turns out this young man had given a lot of money to his family just before the attack. somebody mentioned fighting fire with fire, and that is exactly what isil is doing too. they are fighting the west with western methods where money corrupts everyone including the old fool.
long live western way of life.
Without a shadow of a doubt, the barbarian brainwashed murderer had expressed same views as yours on previous barbaric attacks. He too would have justified, as you do, every other past atrocity. Along with GR, Snauzer, or whatever, are prospective candidates in line for radicalization and embarkation on such acts. You three are a fucking menace and should be kept under watch.
Lordo wrote:miltiades wrote:Lordo wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Even if we accept the legitimacy of the struggle of subjected peoples against colonialism or neo-colonialism - and I do - one surely has to ask if the act of mowing down dozens of innocent civilians constitutes a legitimate form of anti-imperial struggle in the way certain people here appear to be arguing.
ofcourse it is not justified to kill any civilians. the question is not one of justification but one of responsibility and where it begins and where it ends. only a fool would look at this situation and just blame one thing. in fact it turns out this young man had given a lot of money to his family just before the attack. somebody mentioned fighting fire with fire, and that is exactly what isil is doing too. they are fighting the west with western methods where money corrupts everyone including the old fool.
long live western way of life.
Without a shadow of a doubt, the barbarian brainwashed murderer had expressed same views as yours on previous barbaric attacks. He too would have justified, as you do, every other past atrocity. Along with GR, Snauzer, or whatever, are prospective candidates in line for radicalization and embarkation on such acts. You three are a fucking menace and should be kept under watch.
keep taking the medication old man.
the war has to stop where ever it may be. anybody who killes an innocent civilian is a murderer. anybody who killes a soldier who has surendered is a murderer. it is you who keeps justifying killing of over a million civilians in afghanistan, iraq and syria is justfied. you lost it old man. take your medication and your red and dont worry bout a thing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests