Sotos wrote:Stud, prehistoric people existed nearly everywhere and nobody said that Cyprus was uninhabited when the Mycenaeans came.
So are you Mycenaean, Hittite, or Philistine?
Sotos wrote:Stud, prehistoric people existed nearly everywhere and nobody said that Cyprus was uninhabited when the Mycenaeans came.
erolz66 wrote:Sotos wrote:Stud, since you like to divide nations based on the DNA of their people and determine who can and can't be a member of a nation based on that, and since you SHOULD do it for your own nation first before you can promote your fascist view to others, I would suggest you start with the English National team.
This seems to me about as straw man an argument as there can be Sotos. I do not recall STUD ever saying that DNA should determine who can or should be a member of given nation ? Such patterns of migration have nothing to do with citizenship today. However they do I think have something to do with claims that a given people only are the 'native' people of a given place and that others are not ?
Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Stud, prehistoric people existed nearly everywhere and nobody said that Cyprus was uninhabited when the Mycenaeans came.
So are you Mycenaean, Hittite, or Philistine?
Sotos wrote:Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Stud, prehistoric people existed nearly everywhere and nobody said that Cyprus was uninhabited when the Mycenaeans came.
So are you Mycenaean, Hittite, or Philistine?
The Hittites never settled in Cyprus and the Philistines were not event around at the time
Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Stud, prehistoric people existed nearly everywhere and nobody said that Cyprus was uninhabited when the Mycenaeans came.
So are you Mycenaean, Hittite, or Philistine?
The Hittites never settled in Cyprus and the Philistines were not event around at the time
So you “picked up formatting” from imaginary 2000 year old visitors to Cyprus but you no longer pick up formatting from tourists?
Sotos wrote:Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:Stud, prehistoric people existed nearly everywhere and nobody said that Cyprus was uninhabited when the Mycenaeans came.
So are you Mycenaean, Hittite, or Philistine?
The Hittites never settled in Cyprus and the Philistines were not event around at the time
So you “picked up formatting” from imaginary 2000 year old visitors to Cyprus but you no longer pick up formatting from tourists?
See how ridiculous your argument is that Greeks were merely "visitors"?
GreekIslandGirl wrote:[Although, when using the entire set of Y-chromosome haplogroup frequencies, the composition of Cyprus can be explained by contributions from Anatolia, Balkans, and Levant, the actual Greek contribution stood out for the Cypriot E-V13 (87 %), J2a-M67 (74 %), R1b-M269 (48 %), and G-P15 (17 %) components.
The complex genetic structure of Cyprus
Figure 1 presents the phylogenetic relationships and frequencies of the Y-chromosome lineages detected in the six districts of Cyprus. Like other populations in Anatolia and Lebanon, Cyprus exhibits a high level of haplogroup J2-M172 related diversity. J2a-M410 is the dominant Y-chromosome lineage, constituting 26.0 % of the overall Cypriot samples. J2b-M12/M102 splits into mainly J2b-M205 (5.9 %), frequent in Southern Levant (Additional file 5: Figure S2), and J2b-M241 (0.6 %), most frequent in Greece and the Balkans [20, 35]. Overall, the E-M35 haplogroup totals to 23.1 % and contains various E-M78 sub-haplogroups including E-V13 (7.3 %) that is common in Greece [10, 18, 35] and E-V22 (3.5 %), that is frequent in Egypt [10] and Sudan [49]. Another E-M35 related haplogroup, E-M34, previously reported in Asia Minor [31], Southern Levant [50, 51], and the Balkans [35] also was observed in Cyprus (10.3 %).
GreekIslandGirl wrote:[Although, when using the entire set of Y-chromosome haplogroup frequencies, the composition of Cyprus can be explained by contributions from Anatolia, Balkans, and Levant, the actual Greek contribution stood out for the Cypriot E-V13 (87 %), J2a-M67 (74 %), R1b-M269 (48 %), and G-P15 (17 %) components.
The complex genetic structure of Cyprus
Figure 1 presents the phylogenetic relationships and frequencies of the Y-chromosome lineages detected in the six districts of Cyprus. Like other populations in Anatolia and Lebanon, Cyprus exhibits a high level of haplogroup J2-M172 related diversity. J2a-M410 is the dominant Y-chromosome lineage, constituting 26.0 % of the overall Cypriot samples. J2b-M12/M102 splits into mainly J2b-M205 (5.9 %), frequent in Southern Levant (Additional file 5: Figure S2), and J2b-M241 (0.6 %), most frequent in Greece and the Balkans [20, 35]. Overall, the E-M35 haplogroup totals to 23.1 % and contains various E-M78 sub-haplogroups including E-V13 (7.3 %) that is common in Greece [10, 18, 35] and E-V22 (3.5 %), that is frequent in Egypt [10] and Sudan [49]. Another E-M35 related haplogroup, E-M34, previously reported in Asia Minor [31], Southern Levant [50, 51], and the Balkans [35] also was observed in Cyprus (10.3 %).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests