Cyprus-Forum.com

[GreekIslandGirl]

I KNOW what I meant when I wrote what I did ....

Just keeps getting stupider ...

[erolz66]

I KNOW what I meant when I wrote what I did ....

Just keeps getting stupider ...

Impressive. Starting from "One of the most stupid things ever written!" we now have "Just keeps getting stupider".

This then is what you try and pass off as discussion and argument. Nothing new there then.

[GreekIslandGirl]

I KNOW what I meant when I wrote what I did ....

Just keeps getting stupider ...

Impressive. Starting from "One of the most stupid things ever written!" we now have "Just keeps getting stupider".

This then is what you try and pass off as discussion and argument. Nothing new there then.

I didn't notice that you were trying to initiate a *discussion* as I was diverted by your obsessions with the EU and your general disparaging of my comments to other people.

[erolz66]

I didn't notice that you were trying to initiate a *discussion* as I was diverted by your obsessions with the EU and your general disparaging of my comments to other people.

Er it was you who butted in to my discussion with Sotos, with your 'insightful' comment that what I had previously said to Sotos was "One of the most stupid things ever written". Still no need for you to let reality get in the way of your narrative needs, it never has done before, so why start now.

[GreekIslandGirl]

I didn't notice that you were trying to initiate a *discussion* as I was diverted by your obsessions with the EU and your general disparaging of my comments to other people.

Er it was you who butted in to my discussion with Sotos, with your 'insightful' comment that what I had previously said to Sotos was "One of the most stupid things ever written". Still no need for you to let reality get in the way of your narrative needs, it never has done before, so why start now.

What an absolute bare-faced liar you are. Luckily, we have the benefit of the written form to correct you:

cyprus44917-10.html

On page 2

That is where you butted in to my exchanges - FIRST!

I did not comment on your stupidity until page 4.

cyprus44917-30.html

[erolz66]

Two different strands of conversation.

One - your attempts to disparage the conclusions of a report, because those conclusions did not fit your needs, by labelling the conclusions of those who wrote it as 'absolute nonsense' and that such studies need to be 'interpreted'. On which I pointed out how everything that does not suit your needs, needs to be 'interpreted' and gave an example of how you 'interpret' something that does not suit your narrative to claim it says the opposite of what it actual says.

two - my discussion with Sotos about if cultures can reasonably be ranked better or worse than each other, to which you butted in, to disparage something I had said to Sotos as part of that discussion as being "One of the most stupid things ever written".

[GreekIslandGirl]

Two different strands of conversation.

One - your attempts to disparage the conclusions of a report, because those conclusions did not fit your needs, by labelling the conclusions of those who wrote it as 'absolute nonsense' and that such studies need to be 'interpreted'. On which I pointed out how everything that does not suit your needs, needs to be 'interpreted' and gave an example of how you 'interpret' something that does not suit your narrative to claim it says the opposite of what it actual says.

two - my discussion with Sotos about if cultures can reasonably be ranked better or worse than each other, to which you butted in, to disparage something I had said to Sotos as part of that discussion as being "One of the most stupid things ever written".

Not two different strands - same thread topic and you FIRST butted in to disparage comments I made to others. Then your interpretation of what 'fits my needs' was shown to be based on defunct and unreliable sources! The rest was my conclusion on your diminishing ability to make sound judgement - therefore a continuation from AFTER you FIRST butted in. Even now you won't take responsibility and are trying to wheedle out. Tough. It's written!

Anyway, you make a habit of trolling/trashing threads and it's boring!

[erolz66]

Not two different strands - same thread topic and you FIRST butted in to disparage comments I made to others. Then your interpretation of what 'fits my needs' was shown to be based on defunct and unreliable sources! The rest was my conclusion on your diminishing ability to make sound judgement - therefore a continuation from AFTER you FIRST butted in. Even now you won't take responsibility and are trying to wheedle out. Tough. It's written!

All as 'interpreted' by you. QED.

[GreekIslandGirl]

Not two different strands - same thread topic and you FIRST butted in to disparage comments I made to others. Then your interpretation of what 'fits my needs' was shown to be based on defunct and unreliable sources! The rest was my conclusion on your diminishing ability to make sound judgement - therefore a continuation from AFTER you FIRST butted in. Even now you won't take responsibility and are trying to wheedle out. Tough. It's written!

All as 'interpreted' by you. QED.

You can leave all interpretations out and just see the writing on Page 2 (where you FIRST butted in to disparage my views) and then finally to page 4 (when I eventually responded in like manner).

[erolz66]

Not two different strands - same thread topic and you FIRST butted in to disparage comments I made to others. Then your interpretation of what 'fits my needs' was shown to be based on defunct and unreliable sources! The rest was my conclusion on your diminishing ability to make sound judgement - therefore a continuation from AFTER you FIRST butted in. Even now you won't take responsibility and are trying to wheedle out. Tough. It's written!

All as 'interpreted' by you. QED.

You can leave all interpretations out and just see the writing on Page 2 (where you FIRST butted in to disparage my views) and then finally to page 4 (when I eventually responded in like manner).

Yet more of your 'interpretation' to suit your needs. Showing exactly the point I was highlighting. There is nothing that you will not 'interpret' to suit your needs. This is what you always do and have always done here on this forum.

Arguments, positions, views, assertions can have substance and they can also have no substance. My view that your writing off of the conclusion of the report that STUD linked to as 'absolute nonsense' and the need to 'interpret' such data to come to a conclusion you like, was part of a consistent pattern of behaviour of yours to always write of anything that reaches a conclusion you do not like and 're interpret' , has substance.
You argument that what I said to Sotos was "One of the most stupid things ever written" does not have substance.

So probably time for some shrill shouting and screaming, an ethnic based slurs and insults, from you if past behaviour is any indication of future behaviour. What there will not be, will be you addressing the actual issues. You will not for example offer any substantiation for your claim that what I wrote in reply to Sotos was "One of the most stupid things ever written".