Robin Hood wrote:[
I apologise if you did not know what MSM refers to, I thought it was commonly known as being .....
Main Stream Media. The handful of news outlets run by huge corporations that have a monopoly of TV, Newspaper and popular news stories, that is widely available without having to go look for it.
They are often fed the by Reuters or Associated Press and a few other news agencies, who collect from '
sources' around the world and the MSM then runs with the story with there angle added. If that is the only source you use to collect information on anything ..... from Syria to Gaza ....... from Finance to Politics ..... you will only ever read one side of the story. If the MSM prints a load of rubbish, which the independents show to be so a few days later, the Media never apologies for their errors or reprints the article with corrections, but to the mindless hoards that use that as there single source .... it is set in stone for ever. Anything that then gives an alternative and detailed story that refutes the original MSM version gets shouted down ........... as you often do!
You should also look at independent news outlets that are run as non-profit organisations and are not part of the MSM. Often run as one-man-bands and are used to carry the same news story. These are very frequently well know journalists who do not/will not fall into line and follow the MSM's editorial guide lines as their detailed stories often clash with their editorial policies. The articles provide many links to there sources from Govt. papers to UN Reports.
Post Brexit I think you will find, or though incorrect in terminology, refers to after the vote for a Brexit. As I pointed out and you have repeated, there is no
'Post-Brexit' yet, it's all speculation ..... so everything else you have said above is just that, speculation because it can only be your opinion. Just your views as to what YOU think ..... and I note you don't link to any credible source either. If you do not look at other sources for information and make your own assessment of the credibility of an argument and the degree of probability of it being 'true' .........you will never know the full story.
Thanks for the above explanation. I just have my doubts as to whether you really understand it. If you did, you would surely realise that the right-wing media in the UK and especially the right-wing tabloids have for the past three decades been running a campaign using cherry-picked news stories that are slanted and taken out of context to vilify the EU (to quote your words "you will only ever read one side of the story"). That is why the minds of the masses in the UK have been poisoned against the EU. It was this branch of the MSM, as you call it, that has engineered the rise of the far-right UKIP and brought the far right to such a state ascendancy that thugs are now murdering people in the street because they are heard speaking a foreign language. All par for the course for a rag like the Mail, which supported the fascist Nazis in Germany in the 1930's. Do you never stop to ask what the real agenda behind this is; what interests of which interest groups it is all serving? It is a sad fact that Rupert Murdoch, who is not even a British citizen and does not live in Britian, has through his position of control of what you call the MSM in the UK, been able to call the result of every poll in the country since the 1980's, including the EU referendum. This makes my blood boil. If you really believe that you have written above, it should make yours boil, too. Have you never stopped to ponder as to the real motive why a man who doesn't live in the country and is not a citizen wants the country to leave the bloc? Has it not occured to that the reason you keep coming up with quotes from such vile examples of the right wing-gutter press as the Daily Mail and the Daily Express (such as the gem about a so-called post-Brexit boom when Britian has not left the EU!) in your endeavour to cherry pick europhobic news items and post them here is that those two newspapers, prime examples of what you call the MSM, are at the forefront of a campaign to vilify the EU through distorted reporting - and how distorted can you get as using the term 'post-Brexit' to describe a situation in which the UK is still in the union. In my eyes, anybody who constantly uses quotes from the Mail and Express to support their views forfeits the moral authority to use the term 'MSM'.