GreekIslandGirl wrote:
Mine was a minor assumption - yours, in offering what you consider a solution for *both communities* to have *their regions* is an insensitive inference. Built on divide and rule. Your justification that this is a plan *on the table* is absurd. I would wipe that table clean if I were you and find some healthier ingredients with which to make a meal.
It's not a solution that I consider, it's a solution that is being considered by the negotiating parties (hence; on the table, but not on mine as I'm not negotiating anything nor do I have any personal importances in the results).
I'm just asking someone about his views on that, but somehow you now see me as one who has a personal preference for this possible solution. Strange, if you ask me...