supporttheunderdog wrote:gDT. wrote:Robin Hood wrote:DT. wrote:I'm sorry but the inaccuracies that have been listed here are way off. Entertaining, but way off.
On the thread generally or just the links above? If you have knowledge I and others don't have why not share it?
No collateral taken into account in the banks books? How do you think their Core tier 1 ratio is calculated if there are no risk weighted assets?
loans created with no capital??? A banks loan to deposit ratio is critical in understanding the condition of a bank. Why would that even be necessary if loans moved independent of deposits?
I'm not sure where to start....it's pretty much all wrong.
Am I correct in thinking a lot is covered in Basel II and/or Basel III, in particular risk weighted loans to capital ratios where the ratio has got to be above a limit, the bigger the percent the more capital it has relative to the loans, so theortically bankers cannot keep creating money?
Problem is, he will just say that Bankers don't now how Banking works or how they create money which is not really creating money when you break it down. They are creating debts or IOUs which can be used as money for as long the Banking system can support it all. If they go too far and can't support it, they collapse and I am sure the Banks don't want that. It's quite a intricate system which has its own checks and balances. When you think about it, you can only marvel at the Financial System because overall it is very robust, highly regulated, professional and it all works very well!