by erolz66 » Sun May 01, 2016 10:34 pm
Just on and on and on with your relentless distortions - because this is what you do.
If you do not like what the EU, in an official EU evaluation of Greece, plainly stated (as you did not all those months ago)
1. Deny that it was even the EU that said it at all or make out it was some 'theoretical debate' and not a clear cut deceleration by the EU of what the evaluation report on Greece concluded.
2. Make out that it was some 'throw away irrelevant comment' and 'not policy' - Even after the highest policy ratifying body in the EU used the very thing you argued 'was not the thing policy would be based on', as the basis for its implementing decision.
3. Make out that an entirely different document that itself explicitly says is not the Schengen evaluation report on Greece IS the Schengen evaluation document on Greece.
4. Make claim after claim after claim about the Schengen evaluation report on Greece, based on the previous distortion number 3, arguing that a document that was produced before the schengen evaluation report on Greece and covering a period during which no evaluation on Greece at all was completed, was proof that Greece had not been found to be seriously neglecting it obligations in the schengen evaluation report on Greece, despite the EU explicitly saying this is what the evaluation report on Greece concluded and despite 'your' document explicitly saying did not cover the conclusion of the evaluation report on Greece because it had not been completed when 'your' document was produced.
5. Claim that it was Frontex that was found to be seriously neglecting it obligations in the schengen evaluation report on Greece, despite the EU saying explicitly that it was Greece that was found to be doing so in this evaluation report and NOT saying that it was Frontex that was deficient.
6. Claim that it was Frontex that was found to be seriously neglecting it obligations in the schengen evaluation report on Greece, despite the fact that Greece itself publicly registered it's belief that "that the findings of the unannounced evaluation visit carried out from 10 to 13 November 2015 do not constitute “serious deficiencies” and show no evidence that “Greece is seriously neglecting its obligations”, when it, the only country to do so, voted against the implementing decisions of the EU Council based on the evaluation report on Greece, whilst making no comment what so ever about Frontex at all.
7. Make out that it is individuals on this forum that have said these things about Greece, and not the EU themselves.
8. Make out that the 50 recommendations to Greece as things Greece needs to deal with that were a part of the EU councils Implementing Decision, are things that individuals on this forum are saying Greece must do and not the the EU Council.
9. Do all of the above relentlessly, repeatedly month after month after month whilst never once addressing any of the distortions made above when challenged on them.
10. Claim relentlessly, repeatedly month after month after month that those who are exposing these distortions are 'liars' are 'introducing irrelevant EU documents' are unable to understand the EU and how it works and other irrelevant ad hominem attacks.
This is exactly what you have done since your first post about the EU press release that made public the conclusions of Schengen Evaluation report on Greece. For month after month after month. This what you always do here on these forums. You really do seem to think that your lies are more powerful than actual truth. You are wrong, they are not. Truth remains true regardless of your inane, intellectually bankrupt antics here on this forum and will remain true if you keep posting the same distortions for a week, a month, 3 months of 3 years.