Sotos wrote:These other countries have unilaterally closed their borders (and have been allowed to temporarily by the EU and under EU law) because in 2015 hundreds of thousands of migrants arrived in Greece and were 'waved through' without any processing of them what so ever.
So Greece is supposed to accept just ANYBODY coming from Turkey but the rest can accept only those who are processed? Greece is acting in a humanitarian way and it is welcoming everybody, even though they are too many to properly process. They can change this policy and put Schengen above the lives of people... this is clearly what other countries are doing. If this is what you think is right for Greece to do then say it openly.
repulsewarrior wrote:...and obviously the EU is deficient in exercising a Policy that can be respected, external border or not, Greece is not alone in deficiency.
erolz66 wrote:Sotos wrote:These other countries have unilaterally closed their borders (and have been allowed to temporarily by the EU and under EU law) because in 2015 hundreds of thousands of migrants arrived in Greece and were 'waved through' without any processing of them what so ever.
So Greece is supposed to accept just ANYBODY coming from Turkey but the rest can accept only those who are processed? Greece is acting in a humanitarian way and it is welcoming everybody, even though they are too many to properly process. They can change this policy and put Schengen above the lives of people... this is clearly what other countries are doing. If this is what you think is right for Greece to do then say it openly.
I sometimes wonder why I bother ?
All Schengen members with EXTERNAL borders are supposed to control those EXTERNAL borders, so that the need for any INTERNAL (to the Schengen area) boarders are not necessary (just as they are not between England and Wales or Scotland, or between states within the US or Australia etc).
Greece is not welcoming everybody, the very notion is absurd. Nor can it simply choose to do so without being in breach of the agreements it has made and signed. Greece's obligations re the management of Schengen EXTERNAL borders that are in Greece are exactly the same as any and every other Schengen member that has Schengen EXTERNAL boarders. Those Schengen countries that have unilaterally re imposed boarder controls are doing so on INTERNAL boarders. They always have had controls on any EXTERNAL borders and indeed must have such controls as per their obligations under Schengen Acquis.
What the EU needs to do is get a working means of dealing with this crisis at an EU wide level. This involves ensuring that all countries with EXTERNAL boarders process those migrants arriving there properly. It also needs a proper agreed fair way of then distributing those migrants that have valid asylum claims across all member states as well as proper mechanism for evaluating such claims and returning those who do not have valid right to asylum. So far it is failing in getting these things in place, and as a result Schengen is breaking down and to a degree the EU project in it's broadest sense is breaking down. Such a break down will and is affecting Greece way more than it is affecting other members. In 2015 800,000 migrants with valid asylum claims passed through Greece on their way to other countries. If the EU fails to get an EU wide system in place (which includes getting Greece to manage is external boarders properly) then in 2016 there will be 800,000 migrants with a valid asylum claim STUCK IN GREECE. Is THIS what YOU want for Greece ?
erolz66 wrote:All Schengen members with EXTERNAL borders are supposed to control those EXTERNAL borders, so that the need for any INTERNAL (to the Schengen area) boarders are not necessary ...
repulsewarrior wrote:https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/msf-pulls-out-of-lesbos-hotspot-in-yet-another-blow-to-eu/
GreekIslandGirl wrote:erolz66 wrote:All Schengen members with EXTERNAL borders are supposed to control those EXTERNAL borders, so that the need for any INTERNAL (to the Schengen area) boarders are not necessary ...
What a fascistic little dictator you sound like. All sound and fury.
Sotos wrote:erolz66 wrote:Sotos wrote:These other countries have unilaterally closed their borders (and have been allowed to temporarily by the EU and under EU law) because in 2015 hundreds of thousands of migrants arrived in Greece and were 'waved through' without any processing of them what so ever.
So Greece is supposed to accept just ANYBODY coming from Turkey but the rest can accept only those who are processed? Greece is acting in a humanitarian way and it is welcoming everybody, even though they are too many to properly process. They can change this policy and put Schengen above the lives of people... this is clearly what other countries are doing. If this is what you think is right for Greece to do then say it openly.
I sometimes wonder why I bother ?
All Schengen members with EXTERNAL borders are supposed to control those EXTERNAL borders, so that the need for any INTERNAL (to the Schengen area) boarders are not necessary (just as they are not between England and Wales or Scotland, or between states within the US or Australia etc).
Greece is not welcoming everybody, the very notion is absurd. Nor can it simply choose to do so without being in breach of the agreements it has made and signed. Greece's obligations re the management of Schengen EXTERNAL borders that are in Greece are exactly the same as any and every other Schengen member that has Schengen EXTERNAL boarders. Those Schengen countries that have unilaterally re imposed boarder controls are doing so on INTERNAL boarders. They always have had controls on any EXTERNAL borders and indeed must have such controls as per their obligations under Schengen Acquis.
What the EU needs to do is get a working means of dealing with this crisis at an EU wide level. This involves ensuring that all countries with EXTERNAL boarders process those migrants arriving there properly. It also needs a proper agreed fair way of then distributing those migrants that have valid asylum claims across all member states as well as proper mechanism for evaluating such claims and returning those who do not have valid right to asylum. So far it is failing in getting these things in place, and as a result Schengen is breaking down and to a degree the EU project in it's broadest sense is breaking down. Such a break down will and is affecting Greece way more than it is affecting other members. In 2015 800,000 migrants with valid asylum claims passed through Greece on their way to other countries. If the EU fails to get an EU wide system in place (which includes getting Greece to manage is external boarders properly) then in 2016 there will be 800,000 migrants with a valid asylum claim STUCK IN GREECE. Is THIS what YOU want for Greece ?
Clearly the external borders of EU can not be controlled if people are allowed to enter Greece by landing on the beaches of Greek islands. The proper way to enter Greece which would allow Greece to control its borders is for people to enter Greece by passing through the border crossings or by using its legal ports of entry (ports, airports). Greece is allowing people to enter Greece (and therefore enter EU) in an improper way for HUMANITARIAN reasons. This is because Greece, unlike many other countries, places human lives above the control of borders. If Greece didn't care for the lives of those people they could easily use their coastguard and navy to prevent this uncontrolled entry of people and tell them that if they want to enter Greece they should line up at the border crossings at Evros where the papers of each and every one of them would be checked BEFORE allowed entry into the country (and therefore EU).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest