Cap wrote:The road to a new record...
Not Canada, not Oz, not USA, not NZ, not GB.
But Larnaca, Republic of Cyprus.
'At 95, war vet breaks own record as oldest scuba diver'
https://cyprus-mail.com/2018/09/01/at-9 ... uba-diver/
Cap wrote:??
It was filmed and documented Paphiti.
Nothing to do with CY Mail.
Paphitis wrote:
Well it's very odd there Cap because they are claiming 41m. He would have needed a special Nitrox mix to pull that off and at this man's age it would be bordering on insanity.
Without the Nitrox mix, his blood would have the effervescence of a Coca Cola drink and he would either be in a decompression chamber or dead.
PADI has a limit of 38m and that is for advance divers. To let a 95 year old break these safety guidelines is nothing short of utter stupidity.
Peaple need to get their facts right. The Zenobia wreck dive is only 18m but everyone claims 42 m because that is the bottom depth of the wreck. So everyone just over dramatizes and sensationsalize the story that a 95 year old dived down to 41m for 44 minutes. At that depth and that amount of time, the guy would need several decompression stops and wouldn't be able to carry enough oxygen either.
cyprusgrump wrote:I can’t help but think that pretending to be knowledgeable about subjects that you are clearly clueless about might damage your credibility on the forum.
cyprusgrump wrote:Paphitis wrote:
Well it's very odd there Cap because they are claiming 41m. He would have needed a special Nitrox mix to pull that off and at this man's age it would be bordering on insanity.
Without the Nitrox mix, his blood would have the effervescence of a Coca Cola drink and he would either be in a decompression chamber or dead.
PADI has a limit of 38m and that is for advance divers. To let a 95 year old break these safety guidelines is nothing short of utter stupidity.
Peaple need to get their facts right. The Zenobia wreck dive is only 18m but everyone claims 42 m because that is the bottom depth of the wreck. So everyone just over dramatizes and sensationsalize the story that a 95 year old dived down to 41m for 44 minutes. At that depth and that amount of time, the guy would need several decompression stops and wouldn't be able to carry enough oxygen either.
You do type some old bollocks on this forum Paphitis but this takes the biscuit…
Firstly, Nitrox would be the last thing he would need! Nitrox allows divers to spend more time at shallower depths as it contains less Nitrogen. Oxygen becomes poisonous as you dive deeper and 41m is beyond the safe depth of any Nitrox mix.
It is absorbed nitrogen that gives you Decompression sickness if you return to the surface too quickly. Nitrox contains a larger %’age of Oxygen and less Nitrogen allowing you to stay underwater for longer with a shorter decompression. But the maximum depth for Nitrox is 34m because of Oxigen Toxicity.
Secondly, there is no mention of PADI… check the pictures in the article – it has clearly been organised by BSAC.
I used to lead dives on the Zenobia every week – the bottom depth is as you say just over 40m and I went there often – it is perfectly safe.
He didn’t stay on the bottom for 44 minutes, I’d imagine he just stopped there briefly and registered it on his dive computer (I did it often, the alarm would go off!) and the whole dive was 44 minutes almost certainly including a slow ascent and a safety stop at 5m (they have a ‘swing’ that you can sit on to decompress at 5m).
And lastly, the tanks contain compressed air – not Oxygen. It would be perfectly normal to dive on the Zenobia with air, visit the bottom return to the surface and do it again in the afternoon – in fact, that is what they do every day.
I can’t help but think that pretending to be knowledgeable about subjects that you are clearly clueless about might damage your credibility on the forum.
Dozens of divers accompanied Ray as he dived down to 40.6 metres for 44 minutes and the entire process was filmed, photographed and documented in line with guidelines approved by Guinness World Records.
Paphitis wrote:The article said he was at 41m for 44m.
Do BSAC let 95 year olds go to 41m do they. I would like to see their insurance policy.
There is no way PADI let anyone do it when their tables only go to 38 m with standard oxygen bottles.
When you are at 41m for 44 minutes, then the poor bastard would have to have been on Ntrox Enriched bottles (bottles with a more than 21% nitrogen) otherwise he wouldn't be alive.
https://www.scubadiving.com/nitrox-scub ... ion#page-3
Unless of course he was only at 41m for a couple of minutes, which is possible but it is still stupid and it isn't safe at all - not for you and especially not for a 95 year old. PADI tables only take you down to 38m and if BSAC allow more than that then I am unaware of it.
This is what Cyprus Mail claim:Dozens of divers accompanied Ray as he dived down to 40.6 metres for 44 minutes and the entire process was filmed, photographed and documented in line with guidelines approved by Guinness World Records.
Once again, I call bullshit.
they did not say he went down to 41m for a couple of minutes.
Paphitis wrote:The article said he was at 41m for 44m.
Paphitis wrote:Do BSAC let 95 year olds go to 41m do they. I would like to see their insurance policy.
Paphitis wrote:There is no way PADI let anyone do it when their tables only go to 38 m with standard oxygen bottles.
Paphitis wrote:When you are at 41m for 44 minutes, then the poor bastard would have to have been on Ntrox Enriched bottles (bottles with a more than 21% nitrogen) otherwise he wouldn't be alive.
Paphitis wrote:Unless of course he was only at 41m for a couple of minutes, which is possible but it is still stupid and it isn't safe at all - not for you and especially not for a 95 year old. PADI tables only take you down to 38m and if BSAC allow more than that then I am unaware of it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests