Nikitas wrote:Before you get an air force is it not wise to develop anti aircraft means to defend the airfields where the planes are parked?
I recall reading that in the 1973 Arab Israely war, most aircraft losses were not to sophisticated SAM systems or other planes, but to the the "dumb" 30mm cannon that put a lot of metal up ahead of fast planes.
In addition to the air thing that seems to give people the flutters it might be useful to shop for some smart munitions capable of being used in existing artillery, like the Strix anti armor mortars etc. And also some land based torpedo systems that can reach out beyond the 12 mile limit and prevent any blockade of the island.
An old general told me that defence capability is like an onion, multi layered and is built from the inside out, you start with the defence of the perimeter and build outwards. That was the lesson ignored with the S300, we went for the outermost layer of the onion, did not have the means to defend the base for the S300 and lost the plot.
Though where they are now they provide an umbrella that covers the vital area between Cyprus and Crete and most of the Aegean. I wonder if that was not the plan from the beginning.
The S300 was a great Air Defence Sustem and still is although the S400 is better. The S300 is probably on par with the American Patriot which is fantastic but the Russians are a little better at Air Defence than the Americans. The Americans don't see the value in investing as much in Air Defence because they don't believe that their Airfields are that much under threat to the point where they can't get their planes in the air. They also have hundreds of landing options. To a smaller European country, like Cyprus, Air Defence is very important.
Cyprus has the TOR and BUK and should have had the S300 too. They are important because you need to protect Paphos Airport, Larnaca perhaps and Lakatamia.
But still, Cyprus will need to presume that Paphos Airport will be destroyed within minutes. The TAF will throw everything at it. So what can be done? Several things such as:
1) Highway Landing areas. Sweden is the expert at this. You can even build hangars in mountains and store fuel as well as munitions there.
2) base the fighters in Crete where an F-18F will easily be able to fly to Cyprus, loiter for about an hour, hit targets on the ground and engage threats in the air and have enough fuel to return back to Crete.
The mere fact that Cyprus will have this capability is an enormous deterrent to Turkey as Turkey will not automatically control the skies.
Now if they collaborate with the HAF or someone else and had air to air refueling, then the fighters are able to loiter for 3 to 4 hours.
But if it is a big issue, then maybe some Patriots would be invaluable too.
Cyprus already has some highway ALA so all it has to do is make sure it has a few locations it can utilize with bunker space, shitloads of fuel and weapons storage.
Turkey would be furious if Cyprus had these capabilities.