Cap wrote:Paphitis has generally well balanced views.
It's only when he gets passionate about something.... then the scales start tipping....
You must be joking.
Cap wrote:Paphitis has generally well balanced views.
It's only when he gets passionate about something.... then the scales start tipping....
yialousa1971 wrote:Cap wrote:Paphitis has generally well balanced views.
It's only when he gets passionate about something.... then the scales start tipping....
You must be joking.
yialousa1971 wrote:Cap wrote:Paphitis has generally well balanced views.
It's only when he gets passionate about something.... then the scales start tipping....
You must be joking.
miltiades wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:I voted 'no' as in Paphitis hasn't lost the plot, but then I see the question was different. I actually appreciate his informed input on various matters, particularly aerial warfare on which he is very knowledgeable. As to whether I agree or disagree with him, well you would have to ask that on a case by case basis, because sometimes I do and sometimes I don't. Even when I don't I would defend his right to express his opinion, as I would defend anybody who is expressing any opinion that is not criminal, such as expressing support for terrorism.
Tim, the guy openly states that WW3 is not a bad idea, any previous contributions by him are meaningless.
He is wrong, very wrong and must be sent a message that the vast majority of decent people do not share his warped view that WW3 is not so bad!
Cap wrote:Paphitis is not the Paphitis of old, that's for sure.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests