Kikapu wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Sadly, the USA appears to be standing behind Erdoğan, though:
The United States said it rejected the premise that the Turkish government was in league with the militants to smuggle oil. "We frankly see no evidence, none, to support such an accusation," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/12/ ... trsWeGq.97
Perception is not always the reality, Tim. America and NATO are boosting Erdogan's ego for him to get dirty and nasty with Putin, then they will stand back as Putins wipes the floor with Erdogan. Erdogan is already in deep shit with Putin by being called a terrorist and smuggling oil for the terrorist. That's the kind of label Erdogan will not be able to get rid off no matter what the Americans and NATO says on behalf of Erdogan. The damage has been already done and Erdogan is now a damaged goods.
I hope you're right. However, it seemed to me at the time of the recent elections in Turkey (the ones Erdoğan insisted be held because he didn't recognise the result in June!) was a perfect opportunity to get rid of him. If a non-AKP government could have been formed, the December 2013 anti-corruption investigations could have been reopened - and just the material that became public knowledge at that time makes it clear there is plenty to convict him and his crooked family and cronies on - and that would have been the end. The situation in the run up to the poll appeared to be so evenly balanced that surely a few clever interventions here and there could have swung things in the opposition's way. Instead, it looks like he was able to rig the poll with impunity. OK, maybe they genuinely didn't want to get embroiled in the elections, or perhaps it isn't as easy as I think to influence the result.
I just hope the Russians have some substantive evidence to back these claims up. Everything so far is very circumstantial and are things that most observers have been aware of anyway.