Lordo wrote:the russians have no business flying over terggman lands never mind over terggy.
Its turggggey you ignoramus old fool!
Lordo wrote:the russians have no business flying over terggman lands never mind over terggy.
GreekIslandGirl wrote:kurupetos wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:Strategically, I still think the best thing Russia can do is attack Turkey's military in the occupied areas in Cyprus. Then NATO cannot intervene.
It makes so much sense.
Can someone get a hotline to Putin for me?
They may not have to because the Turkish Army will have to withdraw to fight elsewhere.
But there's millions of them!
Putin shouldn't risk hitting Turkey anywhere but in Cyprus where he would have the backing of the UN (since we have all those resolutions asking Turkey to leave) and Turkey is in Cyprus not as a NATO member but on its own behalf. So Russia will be fighting Turkey - *pure* (gloves off) - and not as part of NATO which might escalate matters.
It's such a brilliant strategy - someone really should bring it to Putin's attention.
yialousa1971 wrote:
Lordo wrote:the russians have no business flying over terggman lands never mind over terggy.
http://atimes.com/2015/11/three-reasons-behind-turkeys-downing-of-russian-bomber/
the readers' replies are interesting.
http://atimes.com/2015/11/obama-has-uses-for-turkey-russia-tensions/
Putin pointed out at his joint press conference with Hollande that the Russian side shared with the Americans on a confidential basis the coordinates of their ill-fated flight of last Tuesday (as expected under the recent bilateral protocol with the Pentagon). Putin chose his words carefully:
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests