Cyprus-Forum.com

[Jerry]

No, Jerry, what you are doing is trolling. My comment was a genuine response to the contents of a post. You then attacked me in a troll posting. I politely apologised to you (heaven knows why) and then you attack me again!

I started the thread, "Jerry" appears three times on page one and you didn't notice it was me posting. YOU responded to my post, YOU said it was utter rubbish and later referred to it as silly and yet I'm the troll? Words fail me.

Silly Jerry, where did I say 'it was utter rubbish'? What is 'it', anyway?

Have another look.

Did YOU write the bit I was criticising? No!

As stupid as it was, methinks it was somebody else who used such obscure connotations that amounted to metalanguage to avoid being sued for libel/slander. You are incapable of something so sophisticated ... More like Erolz's department!

Too many people seem to attack you, and I was always wondering if they see something in your posts, that I fail to see.
So far I am totally in the dark.

Someone PM'd me just last week pointing out again how much misogyny they witness directed at female posters.

- I guess you're not a misogynist that puts on their anti-female spectacles before they read my posts.

(With the post Jerry is fuming over, I merely got a tickle at the absurdity of the language and thought it worth a highlight for linguists.)

Not fuming, simply laughing at you, Sorry, didn't realise you were female.

[erolz66]

Coming back to the Cyprus conflict web site you should know that it was clearly IN FAVOR of the Annan Plan.
Imo the site is not impartial.

What makes you think the cyprus-conflict.net site 'was clearly in favour of the Annan Plan' ? The site is not 'impartial' by the way, it does however seek to be 'balanced'. It contains partial content from both sides perspectives as well as laying out each sides main narratives. Impartial and balanced are not the same thing. I do not agree with the content of every document that it links to or reproduces but I do recognise it's attempt to offer balance. For me it remains one of the best resources on the internet with regards to the Cyprus problem.

[erolz66]

Someone PM'd me just last week pointing out again how much misogyny they witness directed at female posters.

Do not confuse disgust and contempt for how you have consistently behaved on these forums over many years for misogyny. My disgust at and contempt for so many of your posts here is a result of how you behave and nothing to do with your gender.

[GreekIslandGirl]

Someone PM'd me just last week pointing out again how much misogyny they witness directed at female posters.

Do not confuse disgust and contempt for how you have consistently behaved on these forums over many years for misogyny. My disgust at and contempt for so many of your posts here is a result of how you behave and nothing to do with your gender.

In your case, I'd say it comes from your self-loathing as you try and justify supporting the illegal Turkish occupation of Cyprus. Squaring your pseudo-image of having a conscience which considers human rights and democracy is impossible, so you do the next 'best thing' which is hate everyone else who is on the right side of legality and twist their words until you satisfy yourself they are as wrong as you are. Cheap and easy tactics.

[erolz66]

In your case, I'd say it comes from your self-loathing as you try and justify supporting the illegal Turkish occupation of Cyprus. Squaring your pseudo-image of having a conscience which considers human rights and democracy is impossible, so you do the next 'best thing' which is hate everyone else who is on the right side of legality and twist their words until you satisfy yourself they are as wrong as you are. Cheap and easy tactics.

I loath your posts here on this forum more than any other poster because no other poster here has shown such a consistent and persistent disregard for factual truth than yourself.

[GreekIslandGirl]

In your case, I'd say it comes from your self-loathing as you try and justify supporting the illegal Turkish occupation of Cyprus. Squaring your pseudo-image of having a conscience which considers human rights and democracy is impossible, so you do the next 'best thing' which is hate everyone else who is on the right side of legality and twist their words until you satisfy yourself they are as wrong as you are. Cheap and easy tactics.

I loath your posts here on this forum more than any other poster because no other poster here has shown such a consistent and persistent disregard for factual truth than yourself.

Your version of truth. With its agenda for justifying the illegal Turkish occupation. I'll take that!

[Lordo]

lets face it gig no matter what anybody says you will always turn it and twist it like a twisty turney thing.

if you boys and girls did not attempt to ethnically cleanse tcs from cyprus there would be no need for any settlers to be brought in. lets face. you cocked up and was found wanting. deal with it but stop moaning like a moaning mingi.

[Pyrpolizer]

Coming back to the Cyprus conflict web site you should know that it was clearly IN FAVOR of the Annan Plan.
Imo the site is not impartial.

What makes you think the cyprus-conflict.net site 'was clearly in favour of the Annan Plan' ? The site is not 'impartial' by the way, it does however seek to be 'balanced'. It contains partial content from both sides perspectives as well as laying out each sides main narratives. Impartial and balanced are not the same thing. I do not agree with the content of every document that it links to or reproduces but I do recognise it's attempt to offer balance. For me it remains one of the best resources on the internet with regards to the Cyprus problem.

It's often worse to be balanced. Imagine a balanced web site on the issue of Jihadists.

Cyprus conflict net was neither balanced nor impartial regarding the Annan Plan. It was clearly pro it.
Take the case of Verhoigen not making it to the media (because of his own fault). It makes no reference to the reasons. It just takes the stance there were conditions of silence and fear. How balanced can that be, to the fact there were at least 10 debates/day over 30 days hosting an equal number of pro and against debaters in the media??

[Pyrpolizer]

Someone PM'd me just last week pointing out again how much misogyny they witness directed at female posters.

- I guess you're not a misogynist that puts on their anti-female spectacles before they read my posts.

(With the post Jerry is fuming over, I merely got a tickle at the absurdity of the language and thought it worth a highlight for linguists.)

I wouldn't go that far to use the word "misogynist". It's clear to me some guys in here can't stand a woman who's not dumb.

[Paphitis]

Not fuming, simply laughing at you, Sorry, didn't realise you were female.

Jerry, that was pretty funny.