GreekIslandGirl wrote:insan wrote:https://books.google.com.cy/books?id=HEjkuhF2GsMC&pg=PA38&lpg=PA38&dq=British+Defence+and+Overseas+Policy+cyprus+1964&source=bl&ots=9o3rhbxfJm&sig=EeoaWoNtbiTFMl0e8bZSt8bJVgQ&hl=tr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=British%20Defence%20and%20Overseas%20Policy%20cyprus%201964&f=false
GIG, there are a lot of different views about it... some pro-this, pro-that and some balanced... but there are some wievs that have been grandmotherly filtered out from a "picture" for a special purpose and presented us as if it was the whole "picture"... this is no good...
However, what I posted were not opinions by some authors!
They are OFFICIAL documents of the British government and its policy makers. These documents have been recently released for public viewing.
As usual you have NOT posted any truths. Just your old tricks, you just cut and paste the bits that suit your ridiculous arguments and ignore the bits that don't. History is full of discussions and proposals they mean very little. The Brits offered Cyprus to Greece in 1915 In return for Greece joining the war. The Greeks declined to YELLOW to fight. Uganda was offered to the Jews as an alternative Jewish homeland. Means NOTHING,,,, Discussions mean nothing. What's relevent is the NOW today, not some half baked deluded pipe dream.Enosis is dead my old Frau and buried deep .....move on!