Lordo wrote:Nikitas wrote:The percentage bit is interesting. No more than X percentage of each constitutent state may be made up of citizens of the other state etc. Which effectively means that all the TCs that remain in Cyprus can move south and not upset this limit.
The logical conclusion is what here? That the south can contain all Cypriots and we leave the north to the settlers?
See why sometimes I assert that an outright partition is the least "bad" solution? And I get shit from all sides then, especially those that promote "re-unification", that "re" in re-unification is so funny. LIke trying to get back to some imaginary situation that never existed.
Akkintzi is stuck, he needs to solve the "problem" before the settlers drown the TCs. For that he needs the myth of a unified independent country etc, in other words the GCs who can legitimately demand a stop to the settler problem, something which he cannot do. But he does not want to mix with the GCs, so he brought up the idea of majorities etc in each constituent state. He is trying to have "re-unification" and partition in a package deal.
The situation is getting funnier with each passing day. Funny because the key is obvious, it is called TERRITORY, but no one wants to touch that one. They would rather spend years talking about properties and complicated formulas.
perhaps you can explain to me how we can have equal political power between the communities under bbf if tcs are not majority in the north. if he said we want no gcs in the north then your statement would be correct. that fat that 34% can return make your statement as shitty as the rest of your post. you control freaks have to learn that you will never have power over tcs again under any circumstances. i was personally hoping that perhaps in 50 years time after all is settled we can move into a unitary state but with bent mentality like yours and the rest of the bastards here, i can tell you the tcs will never trust you again. not in a million years. in fact if this how you are going to be, i suspect bbf will not last long and the communities will migrate one last time into their zones.
you can't have equal political power with an 18% minority....that was the fallacy and the trojan horse of the zurich agreements..you cannot violate the rights of the majority. A BBF does exactly what the zurich veto, to the minority, did to the majority's rights, with or without restrictions/derogations. The restrictions will not be accepted by the EU, due to European Primary Law. Numbnuts/koLordo will probably say, well the eu was present at the Annan negotiations. During those negotiations Cyprus was not a member of the EU. The EU would have possibly accepted them since Cyprus was not a member.Now its a completely different story ,with Cyprus being a member and asking for part of its citizens to be restricted with discriminatory laws...the EU is about individual rights not community rights...huge difference