Oceanside50 wrote:Nikita's wrote:What is not clear is if the rule is an optional one or compulsory. In other words can the TC constituent state raise objections about the GC state allowing in people from the EU on its own territory, or vice versa.
If it's in the solution, then whatever is in the solution becomes federal law and both constituent states would be obligated to follow...both states would also be obligated to enforce and pass state laws in order that the law is followed. Not only will the Tc state have restrictions but as you just pointed out the Greek Cypriot state would be obligated to have them also...
Nikitas also wrote:The other factor not considered by the mandarins is the general prohbition of EU law in the lifting of the corporate veil in case of Eu investments. Greece has already lost a case on this point when it wanted to examine the shareholding and identify individual shareholders of media companies. So how will they control quoted public EU companies buying land in the two regions? Even if they do, when a company buys land with approved shareholders the ownership of the shares can change instantly in any stock exchange after the sale.
another good point....it sounds like they want to turn Cyprus into nazi Germany, where the government will have the power to stop anyone on the street and ask for their race/religion and residence to see whether or not the"sultan's" laws are being followed...or break into any government clerks office to see who bought a piece of property in Kyrenia and what religion and race they were..the possibilities are endless.
in order for something like this to be followed, Cyprus would have to leave the European Union.