Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Lordo** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 1:34 am

here is the explanation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin%27s_finches

by **Get Real!** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 2:51 am

So as an example, why do we find sea shells buried in places where they shouldn’t be?

Is it because the area was once a sea or an ocean which then gradually “evolved” into land as some would have us believe, or is it due to volcanoes or mud slides or tsunamis or some other acts of nature that instantly tossed and shifted them to a new location?

The truth is we don’t know and probably never will although that doesn’t stop evolutionists from being so sure of themselves and spreading their version of events.

Just as the archaeologists driven by nationalism and/or profit are filling in the huge blanks in history with their fantasies so too are the evolutionists pretending to have the answers with their tall tales of monkeys turning into humans and fish turning into frogs and lizards but pray tell…

Why can’t species have been exactly as they are now right from the onset? Why do we need this bizarre tale of everything metamorphosing over time?

Well I guess we can’t have that straightforward logic because it implies a creation!

by **Lordo** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 2:58 am

i dont know of you realise but the core of the earth is liquid and the crus moves. along these lines is where you get all the earthquakes. when it comes to shells on mountains that is because at some point they were under the sea and have been pushed up.

nobody said monkeys turned to humans you silly sod. they have a common ancestor at some point in the past.

but the real revelation about evolution and who is to blame for evolution is obviously females of every species except the seahorse. the reason is cause it is females who determine who to mate with and hence the future genetics of the offspring. when it comes to the seahorse of course the situation is reversed. the ostrich is not much of a male either as it does the incubation just like xerodjehalo. he incubate too all the viruses.

so there you have it.

by **DrCyprus** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 10:47 am

Get Real,

Evolution is observed by Biologists.

Movements and changes on the Earth's surface are observed by Geologists.

They are two different seperate realms of science.

This leads me to believe that your 'faith' in the Bible is nothing but a manifestation of your lack of common Encyclopedic knowledge. Therefore, I urge you to read at least one encyclopedia article on evolution and another on the movement of Earth's tectonic plates before you condemn them.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 10:51 am

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:There is natural evolution but imo man was not a naturally evolved ape.
It's a product of genetic Engineering.(actually multiple ones)
One day we may learn to genetically Engineer ourselves too and that will be a fascinating breakthrough.

GIG is right. GR is wrong.

Good theory!

One billion species, look around you nearly all mammals have the same intelligence like dogs cats etc, and by some miracle only ONE, the humans managed to get the comparatively super intelligence we have?? That's very strange to say the least. if natural evolution (in humans) was the case then there should be at least a hundred species with similar intelligence to humans.

As for the very few remnants of homo sapiens they find, they just prove the sudden and genetically Engineered pushing of the human race and intelligence. Otherwise they would find hundreds of gradual intelligent forms of humans.

Natural evolution happens, but humans did not evolve this way.

by **GreekIslandGirl** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:14 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:There is natural evolution but imo man was not a naturally evolved ape.
It's a product of genetic Engineering.(actually multiple ones)
One day we may learn to genetically Engineer ourselves too and that will be a fascinating breakthrough.

GIG is right. GR is wrong.

Good theory!

One billion species, look around you nearly all mammals have the same intelligence like dogs cats etc, and by some miracle only ONE, the humans managed to get the comparatively super intelligence we have?? That's very strange to say the least. if natural evolution (in humans) was the case then there should be at least a hundred species with similar intelligence to humans.

As for the very few remnants of homo sapiens they find, they just prove the sudden and genetically Engineered pushing of the human race and intelligence. Otherwise they would find hundreds of gradual intelligent forms of humans.

Natural evolution happens, but humans did not evolve this way.

There is a huge difference in intelligence in the family of mammals, going from mice to cows to cats to monkeys to apes and to us. It's measurable. Even within the human species there is a gradation of intelligence (just look around here

).

Your fixation on genetic engineering being the tool to create humans is because you don't appreciate the strength of 'breeding and selection' as a natural tool. And yes, there are hundreds of gradations of beings which came before us all showing lower levels of ability/intelligence than that which we can manifest today. Archaeologists and paleontologists have amassed a wealth of evidence with fossils and artefacts from many timescales.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:27 am

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
There is a huge difference in intelligence in the family of mammals, going from mice to cows to cats to monkeys to apes and to us. It's measurable. Even within the human species there is a gradation of intelligence (just look around here ).

Your fixation on genetic engineering being the tool to create humans is because you don't appreciate the strength of 'breeding and selection' as a natural tool. And yes, there are hundreds of gradations of beings which came before us all showing lower levels of ability/intelligence than that which we can manifest today. Archaeologists and paleontologists have amassed a wealth of evidence with fossils and artefacts from many timescales.

The "huge and measurable" among mammals is nonsense. Just look around you. What's huge is the difference between humans and other mammals.

Hundreds of gradations of beings which came before us?? No. Only a few. As few as those attempts to genetically modify us.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:37 am

GreekIslandGirl wrote:Your fixation on genetic engineering being the tool to create humans is because you don't appreciate the strength of 'breeding and selection'

As for the strength of "breeding and selection" you seem to forget to strength of the need to sex.
I haven't seen a male donkey choosing a female when he needs sex. It's first come first served case.
As for humans LOL, what natural selection do you see around you? Do you see clever women marrying clever men? I actually see the opposite happening.

by **DrCyprus** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:44 am

Bonobo gorillas, our closest relative, have the communicative abilities of a 5 year old human child and can invent and use tools and train their peers to do the same as well.

by **Get Real!** » Sun Oct 18, 2015 12:02 pm

DrCyprus wrote:Bonobo gorillas, our closest relative, have the communicative abilities of a 5 year old human child and can invent and use tools and train their peers to do the same as well.

With all the stupid things you’re posting all over the forum I’m not bloody surprised you are related to bonobos... :lol: