kurupetos wrote:Russia will destroy the US-UK-IS-Turkey coalition. It's only a matter of time...
Robin Hood wrote:Just how dumb can you get!
The US has just dropped 50 tons of arms and ammunition to Islamic Extremists, although these should not be confused with the bad Islamic extremists these guys only do good and help others. These are the good ones, not like those other bad ones like Al-Qaida and Al Nusra ......... oh, I forgot they ARE the good guys now ....... 9/11? well all is forgiven and the REAL bad guys have been re-tagged as ISIS. YEAH .... believe that and you will believe anything!
You can call terrorists whatever you like but the link is the Islamic bit ..... it is that doctrine that drives ALL Islamic extremists. Let's hope Russia knows where this was dropped/stored and blows the delivery and the recipients to smithereens before they can use it.
Robin Hood wrote:Paphitis:
When did I say I hated the Americans? The Americans I have worked with were usually very pleasant people, a bit dumb when it comes to Geography and world politics, but most just wanted to be liked. The problem I have is with their politicians, their dominance of the World banking and financial systems ............. and their endless military actions (direct or proxy) against other nations.
Putin put it very well in an interview on BBC. "We fight terrorists! If Assad falls we will have an Islamic State on OUR doorstep, as such, we have a duty to support the elected Government of Syria to prevent this from happening."
Robin Hood wrote:kurupetos wrote:Russia will destroy the US-UK-IS-Turkey coalition. It's only a matter of time...
No they won't! Putin is far too smart to even discuss a pre-emptive attack on any other Nation............ but the US ..... that is not so cut and dried??????
The US has a first strike option written into the 'constitution' (Pre-emptive warfare). Putin does not make threats or posture ............. he just does what needs to be done and starting WWIII is not on his agenda.
The United States has adopted a no-first-use policy, saying that it "reserves no right to use" nuclear weapons first in the case of conflict. The U.S. doctrine for the use of nuclear weapons was revised most recently in the Nuclear Posture Review, released April 6, 2010.[25] The 2010 Nuclear Posture review reduces the role of U.S. nuclear weapons, stating that
"The fundamental role of U.S. nuclear weapons, which will continue as long as nuclear weapons exist, is to deter nuclear attack on the United States, our allies, and partners."
The U.S. doctrine also includes the following assurance to other states:
"The United States will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapons states that are party to the NPT and in compliance with their nuclear non-proliferation obligations."[25]
For states eligible for this assurance, the United States would not use nuclear weapons in response to a chemical or biological attack, but states that those responsible for such an attack would be held accountable and would face the prospect of a devastating conventional military response. Even for states not eligible for this assurance, the United States would consider the use of nuclear weapons only in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the United States or its allies and partners. The Nuclear Posture Review also notes:
"It is in the U.S. interest and that of all other nations that the nearly 65-year record of nuclear non-use be extended forever."[25]
This supersedes the doctrine of the Bush Administration set forth in "Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations" and written under the direction of Air Force General Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The new doctrine envisions commanders requesting presidential approval to use nuclear weapons to preempt an attack by a nation or a terrorist group using weapons of mass destruction.[26] The draft also includes the option of using nuclear weapons to destroy known enemy stockpiles of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons.
kurupetos wrote:Russia will destroy the US-UK-IS-Turkey coalition. It's only a matter of time...
Paphitis wrote:The US will use its Nuclear Arsenal to defend its allies as well as itself.
DrCyprus wrote:Paphitis wrote:The US will use its Nuclear Arsenal to defend its allies as well as itself.
Who would use a nuclear weapon on a country that also has nuclear weapons?
DrCyprus wrote:Yeah, I get you.
Russia is in Syria to secure their interests like everyone else. If Obama and Putin come into an agreement Syria will be solved in a matter of weeks. The humanitarian crisis they caused will of course scar the region for centuries to come.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest