The following looks like an informed analysis of how things are changing in the region following Putin’s intervention in Syria, setting out from the premise:
Vladimir Putin does not need anyone to tell him that his plan in Syria is wrong, a formula for disaster or that it is delaying any possible political solution. Nor does he need anyone to tell him that the war he began will not achieve the goal of ending terrorism; rather it may increase its dangers. He knows all of that, and perhaps he also realises the strategic consequences for Syria, and even Iraq, but he only cares about the gamble he is taking with the US, and he has a feeling that there is something he could win out of it.
...
and leading to the conclusion:
...
However, those who believe that the Russians went to Syria only to fight against terrorism are mistaken and there is no need for them to wait any longer to change their positions. The criticism of US strategy as ineffective is reasonable, but the Russian strategy is more worrying because it wants to end the Syrian conflict to the advantage of Assad and Iran, neither of whom mind coexisting with Daesh as long as Russia provides the means to contain its extremism. Nevertheless, far from going to Syria in the interests of Tehran and Damascus, it is more likely that Putin is using the war on terrorism and messing with it as a means to provoke the US and Europeans and lure them into negotiating with him regarding Ukraine and strategic security. So far they have refused to do so and do not mind a long term confrontation in Syria as long as they are not getting their soldiers involved. The Americans, like the Russians, are interested in using Daesh and benefitting from the fight against it in order to achieve other goals that have nothing to do with Syria.
Proxy war in Syria starts race to Al-Raqqa by Abdel Wahab Badrakhan
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/artic ... o-al-raqqa