Cyprus-Forum.com

[Garavnoss]

Knowing full well that I am likely to be accused [once again] of targeting your posts, I am going to take you to task on your persistent habit of resorting to abuse and insult whenever you feel inclined to do so.

I have researched many of your past posts and am surprised to note that you very often refer to "Paedophilia, Necrophilia, Incest and other perversions"..., subjects which hardly should be included in any of the exchanges under discussion.

You forgot to include them in your "Rant" above and it set me to wondering WHY ?.

I think I have a satisfactory solution to my own theory on your habit and would like you to explain what you have written [below] prior to the explanation "I" will present for your consideration.[professionally confirmed]

I could never debate the merits of paedophilia, necrophilia incest and other perverted acts.[/quote]

I am sure you must agree that such a statement is quite puzzling.

Since no explanation [as requested] is forthcoming although I am sure you have read the above, I now take it upon myself to broach the subjects you so often highlight, presumably to convince others of your abhorrence of them [do you think you deserve credit ?].

The manner in which you condemn "Paedophilia" so vociferously and with such regularity, could be an indication that YOU in fact, do so in order to suppress such feelings within yourself, it is a well documented fact [professional] that those particular feelings are very often likely to become more pronounced among the older generation and become focused [in many of the more severe cases] upon their OWN grandchildren.

If such emotions are ever detected in oneself, one should hastily seek help, no amount of "Wine" will relieve one of the burden.

I WOULD like your response on this item, I will deal with "Necrophilia" subsequent to your response.

[supporttheunderdog]

Garavnoss has all the appearance of possessing a silver tongue, (he may well be a cunning linguist) but the reality is that it is a lingnam bisulcam, and inside his mouth are venomous fangs....

[Garavnoss]

Garavnoss has all the appearance of possessing a silver tongue, (he may well be a cunning linguist) but the reality is that it is a lingnam bisulcam, and inside his mouth are venomous fangs....

Were I an "American Cavalryman" back in the days of "Sitting Bull" I would have to accept the possibility of such an attribute, were I a "Politician" [of ANY Era] it would most certainly have to be accepted since such a condition is a prerequisite of the position held, indeed, it is regarded as advantageous and even an asset.

However, since I am neither, I can only assume that you have been severely influenced by the filthy outpourings of the forum's great spokesman who will oppose ANY opinion that is at variance to his own.

I must also assume that YOU [like HE] do not have the capacity to quite understand that which you read, if you HAD, you would by now have realised that MOST of the unsavoury attributes levelled at my character [and political persuasions] are sourced from him and that a great deal of my comments should be interpreted somewhat differently.

I cannot assist you if you are also rooted in the same quagmire of ignorance as HE is but, I really think it might be helpful were you to adopt the principles that your avatar "Support-the-underdog" seems to suggest.

Although, granted, you could not descend much lower in supporting the filthy outbursts of "You Know Who".

No disrespect intended to you, I assure you.

[supporttheunderdog]

Garavnoss has all the appearance of possessing a silver tongue, (he may well be a cunning linguist) but the reality is that it is a lingnam bisulcam, and inside his mouth are venomous fangs....

Were I an "American Cavalryman" back in the days of "Sitting Bull" I would have to accept the possibility of such an attribute, were I a "Politician" [of ANY Era] it would most certainly have to be accepted since such a condition is a prerequisite of the position held, indeed, it is regarded as advantageous and even an asset.

However, since I am neither, I can only assume that you have been severely influenced by the filthy outpourings of the forum's great spokesman who will oppose ANY opinion that is at variance to his own.

I must also assume that YOU [like HE] do not have the capacity to quite understand that which you read, if you HAD, you would by now have realised that MOST of the unsavoury attributes levelled at my character [and political persuasions] are sourced from him and that a great deal of my comments should be interpreted somewhat differently.

I cannot assist you if you are also rooted in the same quagmire of ignorance as HE is but, I really think it might be helpful were you to adopt the principles that your avatar "Support-the-underdog" seems to suggest.

Although, granted, you could not descend much lower in supporting the filthy outbursts of "You Know Who".

No disrespect intended to you, I assure you.

The phrase has it roots in European Literature not the wild west and long predates Sitting Bull.. however as you admitted you have been making a deliberate study of Milti, and as I identified your superficially silver tongued posts are so often targeted at him... there is therefore a real dilemma on who or who is not the under dog...

I actually wonder who you are since beneath the term of phrase you use your hates and likes bear something of a similarity to another person here... but I as there is no monopoly on sharing such views and as the turn of phrase is so different I am sure that that is the most speculative of theories....