Cyprus-Forum.com

[yialousa1971]

Crazy Carly Fiorina: Shoot Down Russian Jets to Protect Allies in Syria (Video)




Calls for a no-fly zone around US-backed forces, admits that it is “dangerous”, and “tricky” but very necessary…

Carly has been one of the most shreakingly hawkish candidates, something we wrote about at length a week ago, in an article titled: Certifiably Crazy Carly: Mrs Fiorina & the Sad Decline of a Once Great Nation

In this video, she seems very high-strung, like she's had several cups of coffee. Probably not someone you want in the Oval Office during a crisis.

She ran Hewlett Packard into the ground. One shudders to think where she would take the US.

http://russia-insider.com/en/crazy-carl ... eo/ri10104

[Get Real!]

Good idea, shoot them Russian jets down!

[yialousa1971]

Loved Netanyahu's speech earlier today... The guy should be in Hollywood (not Holy Land)!

This.

[kurupetos]

^^Thanks, mate. Benny is hilarious!

[yialousa1971]

China Voice: U.S. provocations threaten to militarize South China Sea

RSS Feedback Print Copy URL Large image More English.news.cn | 2015-10-17 15:21:48 | Editor: huaxia
BEIJING, Oct. 17 (Xinhua) -- The United States' provocative attempts to infringe on China's South China Sea sovereignty are sabotaging regional peace and stability and militarizing the waters.

The U.S. Navy is reportedly preparing to conduct "freedom of navigation" operations, sending warships within 12 nautical miles of Chinese islands in the South China Sea. The U.S. operations may take place within days, according to reports.

Last month, in his response to China's claim of sovereignty over the South China Sea, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter said the United States "will fly, sail and operate wherever the international law allows, as we do around the world."

White House Spokesman Josh Earnest said on Oct. 8 that U.S. warships patrolling close to artificial islands built by China in the South China Sea "should not provoke significant reaction from the Chinese."

Let us not forget that in October 1962, when the Soviet Union was building missile sites in Cuba -- not even on U.S. soil -- U.S. President Kennedy made it clear in a televised speech that the United States would not "tolerate the existence of the missile sites currently in place."

What on earth makes the United States think China should and will tolerate it when U.S. surface ships trespass on Chinese territory in the South China Sea?

China will never tolerate any military provocation or infringement on sovereignty from the United States or any other country, just as the United States refused to 53 years ago.

China's stand on the South China Sea disputes is firm and clear. China's sovereignty and claims of rights over Nansha Islands and their adjacent waters in the South China Sea have been formed over the long course of history and upheld by successive Chinese governments, and have adequate and solid historical and legal basis.

Just as Article 15 of the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea stipulates, delimiting the territorial seas of China and other countries in the South China Sea shall be in accordance with China's "historic title" to the region.

China has always been, in a constructive and effective manner, a firm upholder of the freedom of navigation as well as peace and stability in the South China Sea. And China has vowed to continue to do so in the future.

China's construction of civilian and public facilities on the Nansha Islands and reefs, which fall within the scope of China's sovereignty, serves not only China but also coastal nations in the South China Sea.

For instance, two lighthouses recently built on reefs in the region have helped guide passing vessels from around the world and significantly improved navigation safety.

Contrary to U.S. claims, it will be the United States, as an outsider, that further provokes tensions in the South China Sea by sending soldiers and warships to Chinese territory in the name of "freedom of navigation."

This is not the first move by the United States to undermine the regional peace and stability that China has worked so hard for.

Over the past several years, the United States has held frequent large-scale drills with its allies in the South China Sea, flexing their military muscles.

According to the website of the U.S. Department of Defense, the country has deployed thousands of civilian and military officials, as well as a huge number of weapons, to the Pacific region.

To destabilize the region and contain China, the United States has deliberately involved non-party nations, such as Japan, in the South China Sea issue and stirred disputes between China and other parties, including the Philippines.

By no means will China let the provocateurs make waves in waters that should be characterized by peace, friendship and cooperation.

Last year, the bilateral trade volume between China and members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) exceeded 480 billion U.S. dollars.

Concerned nations have no alternative but to jointly deal with disputes in the South China Sea that pose a threat to the development and prosperity of parties in the region.

On Sept. 18, in response to remarks made by the commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific on patrolling the South China Sea, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman said China, like the United States, upholds freedom of navigation in the waters.

However, the spokesman stressed, China opposes any country's challenge, in the name of freedom of navigation, to China's sovereignty and security in the South China Sea.

During a visit to Europe in March 2014, Chinese president Xi Jinping stressed that his country will "never stir up any trouble, but will resolutely safeguard its legitimate rights" when it comes to sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Even though enhancing mutual trust and managing disputes through high-level visits and talks still remains the first option for China, the country will, without any doubt, adopt countermeasures against the United States if it doesn't stop military provocations that infringe upon China.

People with vision in Washington should and must see clearly China's determination in safeguarding national sovereignty and regional security.

Related:

Commentary: Planned U.S. provocative move in S. China Sea risks destabilizing region

WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 (Xinhua) -- The United States could shoot itself in the foot if it proceeds with planned naval patrols in the adjacent waters off China's islands in the South China Sea, as such provocation will risk creating miscalculation and destabilizing the region.

U.S. military officials and government spokespersons have recently indicated the country's intention to send navy ships to sail within 12 nautical miles of the islands where China has recently done reclamation work, in a move deliberately designed to challenge China's territorial claims.Full Story

China denies island building "militarizes" South China Sea

BEIJING, Oct. 14 (Xinhua) -- China on Wednesday denied its island building in the South China Sea would "militarize" the area, after U.S. and Australian defense and foreign ministers expressed concern during their annual meeting.

"China's construction on the Nansha Islands serves mostly civilian purposes, helping deliver our international responsibilities and obligations and providing more public good," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying told a regular news briefing.Full Story

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015- ... 722902.htm

[Paphitis]

Crazy Carly Fiorina: Shoot Down Russian Jets to Protect Allies in Syria (Video)




Calls for a no-fly zone around US-backed forces, admits that it is “dangerous”, and “tricky” but very necessary…

Carly has been one of the most shreakingly hawkish candidates, something we wrote about at length a week ago, in an article titled: Certifiably Crazy Carly: Mrs Fiorina & the Sad Decline of a Once Great Nation

In this video, she seems very high-strung, like she's had several cups of coffee. Probably not someone you want in the Oval Office during a crisis.

She ran Hewlett Packard into the ground. One shudders to think where she would take the US.

http://russia-insider.com/en/crazy-carl ... eo/ri10104

Crazy? I think not.

If the USA did that, you will see the "Russian Bear" roll over like a little pussy cat.

If her Republicans win, then you can probably expect some very decisive action in Syria from the USA, such as the declaration of a "NO FLY ZONE" over rebel areas, and Pootin will be forced to pack it in or risk WW3.

[yialousa1971]

Britain to send ships and troops to NATO buildup against Russia
In the summer, a NATO summit in Warsaw will decide about the number of the troops.

British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said on Wednesday that Britain will deploy more ships and troops to join the NATO buildup against Russia.

According to some reports, the UK will send five extra ships and additional troops to the Baltic to be stationed on a rotational basis in six countries bordering Russia.

In the summer, a NATO summit in Warsaw will decide about the number of the troops.

“Increasing our NATO deployments sends a strong message to our enemies that we are ready to respond to any threat, and defend our allies,” the British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said.

Fallon also said that the deployment would be Britain’s first contribution to a permanent NATO naval force since 2010.

After ending all practical cooperation with Russia over the Ukraine crisis, NATO has been expanding its presence in Poland and the Baltic nations in order to prevent what it calls Russian threat.

Russia has repeatedly said that NATO move poses a threat to both regional and international peace.

Ethnic Russian populated Donbass has been severely affected by the civil war since April 2014, when Kiev authority launched a military crackdown on a regional protest. It was reported that more than 9,000 people have been killed in the conflict.

However, US and the EU accused Moscow of destabilizing Ukraine and imposed several sanctions against Russia which repeatedly rejected western claims.

http://southfront.org/britain-to-send-s ... st-russia/

[Lordo]

there is not going to be a third world war - the syrians and the iraqis are paying for all of it with their blood. with blood muslim blood you christian blood suckers.

[kurupetos]

as you can see the iranians the russians and the yanks will fight together when they want to. the chinese will join them too. the muslims seem to be the enemy in the region as they are being oppressed in all the countries. when the shiites and the sunis unite gawd help you lot. you will not have a rats hole to hide in. they ned a few more decades before they wake up and realise who the real enemy is

Iranians are smart people... I don't think they will remain muslims for much longer...

I posted the above last September... cyprus44026-70.html

After six months I am proud to say that I was right!

Mass conversion of Iranians to Christianity...

[yialousa1971]

Russia Suspends Memorandum With US on Flight Safety in Syria - Foreign Ministry

Russia has suspended its memorandum of understanding on air safety over Syria with the United States following the deadly US missile attack on the Sha'irat airfield, the Russian Foreign Ministry said Friday.

"Russia suspends the memorandum on the prevention of incidents and ensuring air safety during operations in Syria reached with the US," the ministry said in a statement.

The United States launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Syrian military airfield in Ash Sha'irat near Homs late Thursday. US President Donald Trump said the attack was a response to the alleged chemical weapon use in Idlib on Tuesday, which Washington blames on Damascus.

https://sputniknews.com/politics/201704 ... ht-safety/