Londonrake wrote:Still fighting back the hordes I see.
I think the hordes are steadily changing sides!
Londonrake wrote:Still fighting back the hordes I see.
Robin Hood wrote:Londonrake wrote:Still fighting back the hordes I see.
I think the hordes are steadily changing sides!
Londonrake wrote:Robin Hood wrote:Londonrake wrote:Still fighting back the hordes I see.
I think the hordes are steadily changing sides!
No, I meant the hordes in here.
Robin Hood wrote:There are few worth debating anything with on here, it has become very TC vs GC orientated.
Linichka wrote:'Don’t worry boring old fart… you may not even be around by the end of the year.'
And nor may you be, GR - or any one of us, for shit's sake.
repulsewarrior wrote:Linichka wrote:'Don’t worry boring old fart… you may not even be around by the end of the year.'
And nor may you be, GR - or any one of us, for shit's sake.
...if there was a 'like' button, i would have pushed it.
Londonrake wrote:Another year and this “The end is nigh! We’re all doomed, DOOMED, I TELL YOU!” thread will have lasted longer than WW2.
I think the first response to the OP pretty much set the tone.
General Clark returned to meet with the unidentified general some 6 weeks later, by which point the Bush administration had already started bombing Afghanistan. Gen. Clark asked: "So, we still going to war with Iraq?" The unidentified general informed Clark that it was "worse than that," before reaching for his desk and presenting Clark with a memo that he had received from the office of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld. The unidentified general informed Clark that in his hands he had a memo describing how the US was going to take down seven countries in five years, "starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran."
Britain is to send a nuclear-powered attack submarine to the Gulf after Iran seized a British-flagged oil tanker
yialousa1971 wrote:Londonrake wrote:Another year and this “The end is nigh! We’re all doomed, DOOMED, I TELL YOU!” thread will have lasted longer than WW2.
I think the first response to the OP pretty much set the tone.
Read this stupid.
Robin Hood wrote:According to the Iranians, the Captains are suspected of breaking International Maritime 'Protocols'. They will impound the ship and if found to have breached the Law, after due process, the owners will be fined and the ships released..... when the fine is paid. The British did the same to the Iranian ship off Gibraltar because it breached EU (read US) sanctions.
Whilst the UK Foreign Secretary finds Iran's actions to be "Totally unacceptable .... and worthy of robust action", it seems its OK for the UK to enforce 'regulations' by impounding commercial shipping ............ but not Iran. Double standards?
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests