Paphitis wrote:Maximus wrote:Paphitis wrote:Maximus wrote:Paphitis wrote:Let's put things into perspective. 4 Gulf States have provided over 3.5 billion in aid to Syrian Refugees, and that is on par with the USA.
I would say their contribution far exceeds that of the UK which has proven to be dismal!
“We know that the Gulf could take in Syrian refugees, but they have never responded,” said Omar Hariri, a Syrian who had recently fled Turkey on an inflatable raft with his wife and 2-year-old daughter.
Speaking by phone from Athens, he said he saw hope in Europe, not in the Gulf.
“They have helped the rebels, not the refugees,” Mr. Hariri said.
At least they have put their money where their mouth is and made a significant and very impressive contribution.
Compare their contribution to the UK and you will will see that they have outdone everyone except for the USA but in real terms they have offered more aid than anyone on a per capita basis.
And no, the KSA would probably be an inappropriate destination for a SHIA.
Are you going to try to convince me now that the UK or Europe is a more appropriate destination for the Shia?
Oh silly me!
What do you think Max? Do you really think sending them to KSA is a bright idea or even desirable to them?
Cyprus is also a good place for them and I am sure most Cypriots would agree.
Just answer the question.
Rich Arab states vs Europe? Which do you think is most appropriate for the Shia?