Kikapu wrote:Who were the one or two cunts of the judges in the ICJ who had voted against the majority’s rulings on Israels’ genocidal attacks on the Palestinians?
Fucking Zionist Nazis lovers, whomever they were!
This is a good interview on the rulings against Israel by the ICJ.
How nice it is to listen to two well informed people having a sensible discussion.
Most people understand that a Judge gives his opinion based on the strongest argument between the prosecutor and the defense. He makes a judgement by passing an opinion as he understands each argument. To do this he refers to LAW and The LAW is never black-and-white.
What is overlooked is that the Judge cannot judge and the opposing legal teams cannot argue their cases ..... without establishing the crime scene and that takes a lot of time, manpower and money. So, the actual hard and forensic evidence will take years to establish and authenticate, before their is a TRIAL and a final Judgement can be made.
What we have now is a Judgement only that there IS sufficient primary evidence for a full investigation and if there is sufficient evidence ....... for a trial(s).