repulsewarrior wrote:
Seems like a decent guy.
repulsewarrior wrote:
Footage of the explosion, along with images of the aftermath, suggest the Israeli military may not have been responsible
This is the most noticeable damage to the ground, which, if it were the impact point of the munition used, would mean it’s pretty small payload,” Eliot Higgins, founder of Bellingcat, the leading open source investigation agency.
Nathan Ruser, a researcher at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, wrote on Twitter: “The photos of the scene are, to me, not consistent with an airstrike and are not consistent with claims that 500 plus people were killed.
Maximus wrote:Kikapu wrote:
The “missiles” used by Hamas is nothing more than glorifies firework rockets, which they cause very little damage when they land in Israel,
BBC reporters also say they found small crater and no rocket shells to be able to identify the origin of the rocket.
These links contains images from the site. It doesn't look like there was much damage.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67144061
https://www.theguardian.com/world/galle ... n-pictures
they way you lot are talking, I thought the whole hospital was blown up, but it was the parking lot.
Kikapu wrote:Maximus wrote:Kikapu wrote:
The “missiles” used by Hamas is nothing more than glorifies firework rockets, which they cause very little damage when they land in Israel,
BBC reporters also say they found small crater and no rocket shells to be able to identify the origin of the rocket.
These links contains images from the site. It doesn't look like there was much damage.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67144061
https://www.theguardian.com/world/galle ... n-pictures
they way you lot are talking, I thought the whole hospital was blown up, but it was the parking lot.
Max, you are taking my statement on the “missiles” fired by Hamas being nothing more than a glorified fireworks rockets out of context.
Hamas has fired thousands of such rockets over the years into Israel and caused very little damage or injuries. If these rockets are not so devastating when they land in Israel, why would it be so devastating when it hit the Gaza’s hospital compound as suggested by Israel, killing hundreds of people and destroying cars and buildings?
As for the small so called crater without any scorched marks or rocket fragments, it is more than likely a crater from another time.
The fact that Israel stated that there were rockets fired by Hamas from nearby cemetery towards Israel, makes more sense that a patrolling Israeli jet fired a projectile towards the source of the rockets fired from, but hit the hospital compound instead. It was dark, so the pilot of the jet sent something down as close as he thought where the rockets were being fired from, but not close enough in the end, and instead, kills hundreds at the hospital compound.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests