cyprus remaines divided not because the US wants it to be.
cyprus remaines devided because we dont want /& we are unable to find a solution.
Aren't there UN resolutions calling for all foreign troops to withdraw from Cyprus and the respect of the sovereignty of RoC?
Aren't the UN supposed to help enforce their own resolutions? Didn't they do that in the cases of Iraq (and every other case it suited the Americans)?
Since when our human rights are negotiable? Yes, we can negotiate some things and we do, but not to the degree to accept violations of our human and democratic rights!
Shouldn't the UN plan be based on the UN principles, such as this:
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html ?
The UN role is not just to be mediators. They are supposed to hold to their own principles. Unfortunately they remember their principles only when it suits their main patrons (US, UK etc)
The UN proposing something like the Annan plan was indeed one more proof that the UN have failed to fulfill the reason they were created.
If a country of half a million people is left undefended to be illegally occupied by a country of 60 million and the only thing that the UN can propose is legalization of the results of the invasion, something which is against their own resolutions and principles, then there is no reason for the UN to exist.
If all we needed was a mediator that would simply be in the middle of the two sides, without caring about international law, human rights etc, this mediator could be the EU, or some country.
UN's role is not to be a mere mediator who will allow the powerful to impose his unfair demands on the weak.
Cyprus remains divided because we don't have the power to liberate it, and the UN who were supposed to protect the weak and help enforce their own resolutions and principles did nothing in this direction.