Sotos wrote:I am not asking different questions I am asking for you to clarify what you mean.
No Sotos you are consistently avoiding answering the question I have asked.
Sotos wrote:Generally speaking the wishes of any group of people need to be considered.
This is not an answer to the question I have been asking for pages and pages of this thread now and you steadfastly refuse to answer. the question was
Can you admit that the TC community had a
right to resist the imposition of enosis on them without any consideration being given at all for their communal wishes
Sotos wrote: What were TCs communal wishes that were not considered by GCs? But to agree (or disagree) with the rest, you need to tell me what were the communal wishes of TCs that we refused to consider. Did the TCs ask from us to provide assurances for their security in case of enosis and we refused?
The question I have asked is one of principal. I am not asking what may have actually happened or not happened. My question is not about arguing if the GC leadership did or did not make efforts to 'consider the wishes of the TC community'. The above is just more avoidance BS from you. So I will rephrase the question and no doubt you will continue to avoid answering it.
Did / would / does the TC community have the
right to resist the imposition of enosis on them IF such imposition was attempted without any consideration for their wishes.
That there
were efforts to consider "a formula of union between Cyprus and Greece which might prove acceptable to them all [both communities]" even as late at 1965 is well and clearly documented, most explicitly in the Galo Plaza's Special UN report. As is the reality that, in the official words of Galo Plaza "the leaders of the Greek-Cypriot community have remained vague both as regards the timing of the proposed referendum and the form of Enosis. On the timing of the referendum. Archbishop Makarios has indicated that it is a decision for the people of Cyprus to take and that the proposed referendum could, for example, take place either immediately, or in a year, or in five years. On the form of Enosis, Archbishop Makarios has merely said that this would be decided by the Government of Cyprus in agreement with Greece before the Cypriot people are consulted on the subject. He has also left it to be understood that in the event that Enosis is chosen, any arrangements to be made after it has taken place would fall under the exclusive responsibility of Greece." It is clear that Makrios was not interested in trying find a formula and form of enosis that could prove acceptable to the TC community for he believed then as you STILL do now that a GC numerical majority in Cyprus pursuing what Plato would have called a 'feudalist' interest had the right to impose enosis on the TC
without having to pay any regard for the wishes of the TC community. That it simply did not matter what the TC community may have wanted in the face of what a GC numerical majority wanted. In short he believed in a 'democracy' that Plato would have called an 'empty name' as you apparently still do but do not yet have the guts to just come out and openly say you do.