Nikitas wrote:Fidelis, yes, and we are concerned about the situation and that is why we are discussing it.
Paphitis phrase really encapsulates it: "Yes sometimes jobs are handed out based on who you know in America, UK, Australia, Gulf States and even China but there is a difference. You still have to be qualified and be able to do the job and not just a taxi driver."
And that is the difference between the Greek versions of "Rousfetti" and others. In other places you get the job by favoritism, but you got to DO IT. Here Rousfetti extends through your career and you can be a total schmuck but all is forgiven, and there is always the qualified flunky who is kept under the schmuck's thumb doing the job for shit pay and no prospects.
There are brilliant exceptions, invariably in the private sector, in companies like Cocomat, shipping companies, food technology and IT, hopefully in the armed forces too. These companies are now being penalised with a tax increase and the compulsory deposit of 100 per cent of tax, effectively doubling their taxation for two years.
Things need to change fast.
In my experience, favoritism is well founded.
I was on a selection committee for a bit, and quite often the term "known quantity" was used for applicants who were either known by anyone on the panel or someone else within the company.
The definition of this term was applied to those who you went to school with, or had worked with before and because the industry is quite small the phenomena would occur regularly. The applicant was in effect being vouched for by people he/she knew within the company. People who were known quantities had massive advantages over anyone else. But once they were in, the rules were the same for them as anyone else and they could washout. 2 failures during training and they're out.