Jerry wrote:Sotos wrote:
So basically you agree to give to them the north as long as it is a bit smaller than what they occupy now ... and you also agree to give them 50% say for the whole of Cyprus, basically taking away from the native Cypriots the right to rule their own country. That is not a solution. That is making the problem worst!
As legitimate residents and landowners in Cyprus the TCs must be entitled to some of it. They have taken the north whether we like it or not, we need to negotiate the return of a significant part of it. Only the ROC can legitimise the northern state whatever its status, it will have to be a trade off, territory for acceptance of a northern component state.
The only thing that TCs can have as residents and landowners is ... be residents and landowners! Not a separate state of any kind... especially when that's on stolen land!
Ultimately economics, not the federal constitution, will determine who governs Cyprus, the 50/50 "say" will be irrelevant
Here are some more of those kind of sophistries: "It doesn't matter because we are in EU and EU takes all the decisions anyway", "That arrangement is only temporary until we can trust each other" etc. All nonsense! Why do you think the Turks insist so much on this issue if it is so unimportant? Don't believe the one liner nonsense that you hear. How Cyprus is governed is the MOST important issue... more so than land. Because if we get that wrong then Turkey will have control of the whole Cyprus, which is EXACTLY what Turkey wants. You think partition is the best possible outcome for Turkey? Think again! Something like the Annan plan is what would suit Turkey best. Turkey controlling the whole Cyprus is much better for them than controlling just 1/3rd of it.