Pyrpolizer wrote:Kikapu wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Oceanside50 wrote:
Even at best with no derogations the TC state could reverse and make it like the Annan plan, but with one it would not even be considered in any court because from that one you could have all through legal interpretation and because the Gc voted for it.. My question is this. Why have our astute politicians(idiots) played the game of wanting a BBF for the past 41 years?
Because Denktash wanted partition and was talking clearly to the UN of what he wanted.
Our wise guys (starting with Klerides) who always wanted to be praised as the good boys even pushed the UN to issue a resolution that the solution should be BBF with political equality.
So just like they got trapped with the Annan Plan of trying to show up as the good boys (remember Papadopoulos himself sent a letter to the UN asking for negotiations on the Annan Plan) they got trapped in this BBF deal as well.
But Pyro, without the BBF deal, how else could the GCs get out of the 1959 agreements, specially once Turkey was already in Cyprus. BBF has bought a lot of time for the GCs as well as an opportunity to get rid of the 1959 agreements, and with a good BBF based on True Federation, there's always a chance the the country can once again become a unitary state in the future if all goes well with the TCs. Who knows, perhaps without BBF on the table for the last 40 odd years, it is possible the north would have been recognised by now. I don't know.
Problem is Kikapu that when BBF was first introduced there were very few settlers, practically no carpetbaggers, the number of the true Tcs was high enough, the majority of surplus housing was available for resettlement etc so we could reach a good BBF without much worries.Now we hear Nami saying he wants the minimum number of people relocating simply because he has no place to relocate them. We hear Morfou cannot be returned because it was developed.
Don't get me wrong in reality I respect Nami because from what I heard from his interviews he is a man who thinks of the difficulties of both the TCs and the Gcs and tries to find solutions under these very difficult conditions.
Imo BBF should have been replaced by autonomy for the Tcs within a Unitary state. Nevertheless it may still be possible to find a good BBF solution without derogations and nonsense, however it's really hard I think. How hard it is it will show when they start discussing the property issue. I still have some hopes, we will see...
the truth is has anyone really did a analysis that if the tc state was reduces to say 25-27% so you figure 90-100 k gc return to the gc state and the rest get their property rights in the north how many would actually return?someone who is 45 years old was four years old during the invasion basically has no ties to the north,i think that most of those 60-70k who would be entitled to get their properties in the north would most likely(80-90%)sell