Oceanside50 wrote:
It's an instance of overriding federal law and that it can be done. I was on on a sidewalk in Washington dc the other day smoking a cig a black couple came up to me and asked for a light , I thought it was a cig I was lighting but instead was a blunt filled with pot, not kidding, i asked where he got it he said he grew it and was allowed. I asked if he had one for me and he said he couldn't do that it would be illegal. Now back to state vs federal laws. There are no more then 5 states including the district that allow pot, the other roughly 45 don't. Why do you think that is? In fact Virginia that borders the district doesn't allow pot. 2 miles away in Virginia and you get jail time.. Where's the difference?
The important thing is to reach a reasonably acceptable BBF solution.
BBF may not be sustainable for say more than 20-40 years. The TCs may want permanent derogations to be sure it will last for ever. The Gcs will simply not accept, neither temporary, nor permanent derogations end of story..
The Tcs should digest the fact that BBF is just the start point. It may continue for ever be BBF it may not.
Nobody can guarantee it, and they cannot ask for derogations that violate basic human rights of the GCs just to be sure.
Lordo thinks he did us a favor by accepting maximum number of GCs residing in the TC Fed state of 50K LOL.
What the real number will be over the years nobody knows. the fact is nobody can set quota. The right to reside in any part of the Federation is undeniable.
Now as for your worries that they may impose laws based on an already existing racist agreement, that's very true, so the answer is we should not accept a racist agreement on the first place.