Cyprus-Forum.com

[Pyrpolizer]

not at all. terggy intervened to protect the tcs. if roc was attacked by say syria, then gcs would have been protected too. the problem is that fact that greace and gcs attacked first the gcs and then tcs. their protection was vital. the agreement was signed by 5 people and it can only be removed by 5 signatures. you are treating international law with childsplay. it is a contract in law and cannot be removed with out the agreement of all five.

if you are having difficulty understanding basic law perhaps a lawyer may be helpful to you. there is more lawyers in sheeprus then terggish soldiers.

Nonsense! The treaty of guarantee has nothing to do with the protection of the TCS.
The treaty of Guarantee was to protect THE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER!
With a solution we will have a New constitutional Order

[boulio]

not at all. terggy intervened to protect the tcs. if roc was attacked by say syria, then gcs would have been protected too. the problem is that fact that greace and gcs attacked first the gcs and then tcs. their protection was vital. the agreement was signed by 5 people and it can only be removed by 5 signatures. you are treating international law with childsplay. it is a contract in law and cannot be removed with out the agreement of all five.

if you are having difficulty understanding basic law perhaps a lawyer may be helpful to you. there is more lawyers in sheeprus then terggish soldiers.

Nonsense! The treaty of guarantee has nothing to do with the protection of the TCS.
The treaty of Guarantee was to protect THE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER!
With a solution we will have a New constitutional Order

exactly Turkeys obligation was to protect and restore that constitutional order,thus Turkey will never be a guarantor again.

[Lordo]

not at all. terggy intervened to protect the tcs. if roc was attacked by say syria, then gcs would have been protected too. the problem is that fact that greace and gcs attacked first the gcs and then tcs. their protection was vital. the agreement was signed by 5 people and it can only be removed by 5 signatures. you are treating international law with childsplay. it is a contract in law and cannot be removed with out the agreement of all five.

if you are having difficulty understanding basic law perhaps a lawyer may be helpful to you. there is more lawyers in sheeprus then terggish soldiers.

Nonsense! The treaty of guarantee has nothing to do with the protection of the TCS.
The treaty of Guarantee was to protect THE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER!
With a solution we will have a New constitutional Order

exactly Turkeys obligation was to protect and restore that constitutional order,thus Turkey will never be a guarantor again.

absolutely and if the roc was attacked then she would have done. the problem was that it was one of the guarantors and the gcs who attacked first. so the treat is still in place gavole boses fores nado bumen

trust you do not want a new constitutional order. it means dissolving the old one and we can only have a confederation after that. i dont think you will not want that will you.

[repulsewarrior]

Greece, Turkey, Britain, all betrayed the Cypriot people and the Republic, in that order i might add.

[Lordo]

Greece, Turkey, Britain, all betrayed the Cypriot people and the Republic, in that order i might add.

and the leaders of gcs and tcs rw. they all betrayed the cypriots and the republic. they could not wait to dismantle it.

[Paphitis]

if only it was that easy to break international agreements. anyone can remove themselves from their obligation. it will be jungle rule and we know who would win that one dont we boys.

Yes Turkey has violated the Treaty of Guarantee!

It was that easy for them.

[Paphitis]

there are two agreements. one was setting up the republic and the other was protecting it. there is no discussion on the latter. gavole which bloody school did you go to. in the annan plan was there a chapter for the guarantees to be had or removed. if it was as simple as that why has greace suddenly started saying they do not wish to be part of the guarantor pact. is it that easy to break an agreement. you will find terggy will agree to remove the pact if you ask nicely say no more

And Turkey is in violation of this Treaty right?

[Paphitis]

not at all. terggy intervened to protect the tcs. if roc was attacked by say syria, then gcs would have been protected too. the problem is that fact that greace and gcs attacked first the gcs and then tcs. their protection was vital. the agreement was signed by 5 people and it can only be removed by 5 signatures. you are treating international law with childsplay. it is a contract in law and cannot be removed with out the agreement of all five.

if you are having difficulty understanding basic law perhaps a lawyer may be helpful to you. there is more lawyers in sheeprus then terggish soldiers.

The TCs were never attacked by the Coupists.

And yes, the Treaty is suppose to protect Cypruots and the RoC. Pretty clear violation!

[Paphitis]

there are two agreements. one was setting up the republic and the other was protecting it. there is no discussion on the latter. gavole which bloody school did you go to. in the annan plan was there a chapter for the guarantees to be had or removed. if it was as simple as that why has greace suddenly started saying they do not wish to be part of the guarantor pact. is it that easy to break an agreement. you will find terggy will agree to remove the pact if you ask nicely say no more

Maybe you haven't heard, but the GCs said OXI to the Annan Plan in 2004 because it included things like the "treaty of guarantee"!

If the "treaty of guarantee" were to follow any new Cyprus, then why was in necessary to be included in the AP? It should have been given that it will be there around Cyprus's neck in perpetuity, no?

tell me which chapter it was in. guarantee was a separate issue which to this date has not been discussed and resources were also left out of the equation to be agreed after the agreement on annan plan.

terggy and greace and the uk together never attended any talks before 2004. how the hell could talat and tasobullagi have agreed on something they have no power over.

It serves your interest for Greece to attend. Do you really think they are stupid?

We don't want them and we don't want Turkey either!

[Lordo]

instead of talking stupid like a two year old who cant have his toy, why dont you explain legally how you are going to negate the signed agreement. which court under which rule. if terggy attacked roc for no reason i can possibly see that happening but it was you who attacked tcs with the help of the dress wearing galamaraes. get it if anybody greace and gcs should be removed from the agreement. that leave terggy tcs and uk. thats is result.