GreekIslandGirl wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:Tim Drayton wrote: ... However, if there is a settlement of the Cyprus problem involving the creation of a federal state having Greek and Turkish as its official language, and a Greek Cypriot statelet having Greek as its official language, and a Turkish Cypriot statelet having Turkish as its official language, it is pretty obvious to my mind ....
Oh, wouldn't you just love that! The Imperialist-British dream solution!
Cyprus didn't go into the EU to set up "Turkish statelets" to complete the nonsense that Imperialist-Britain imposed upon us in 1960!
This is known as an ad hominem argument where, incapable of addressing the arguments,
I didn't comment on you ( as a person) at all but addressed what I thought on what you wrote.
But, deflect away ....
You said: "Oh, wouldn't you just love that! The Imperialist-British dream solution!" when I described how I envisage a bi-communal, bi-zonal federal Cyprus would be structured. It has nothing to do with whether I would love it or not. You presume, incorrectly, that I am a supporter of British imperialism, and that is why I am supposed to be arguing in favour of such a solution, when I am not, I am simply describing the structure that it would lead to - irrespective of whether or not I support it or think it would work. This is crass ad hominem argumentation and does not become any intelligent person.
Who is deflecting? If you disagree with my description of the way in which a bi-communal, bi-zonal federal Cyprus would be structured, if it came into being, and why this would almost certainly result in Turkish becoming an official EU language, address the issue instead of calling me a colonialist.