GreekIslandGirl wrote:Tim Drayton wrote: ... However, if there is a settlement of the Cyprus problem involving the creation of a federal state having Greek and Turkish as its official language, and a Greek Cypriot statelet having Greek as its official language, and a Turkish Cypriot statelet having Turkish as its official language, it is pretty obvious to my mind ....
Oh, wouldn't you just love that! The Imperialist-British dream solution!
Cyprus didn't go into the EU to set up "Turkish statelets" to complete the nonsense that Imperialist-Britain imposed upon us in 1960!
This is known as an ad hominem argument where, incapable of addressing the arguments, you attack the person making them or what you assume to be their motives. In fact, the issue at debate is not whether I or you favour a bi-communal, bi-zonal federal settlement, but rather if there were to be such a settlement, whether this would lead to Turkish becoming an official EU language. Given:
1. A bi-communal, bi-zonal federal settlement (regardless of whether or not one favours such a settlement) will see the establishment of a federal state whose official languages will be Greek and Turkish, and the establishment of two statelets or cantons or whatever they will be called, one of whose official and working language will be Turkish, and
2. Provision has been made in one of the protocols to Cyprus' EU accession which provides for the temporary suspension of the
acquis communautaire in the area of the island whereby “In the event of a settlement, the Council, acting unanimously on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, shall decide on the adaptations to the terms concerning the accession of Cyprus to the European Union with regard to the Turkish Cypriot Community,”
it appears to me certain that one such measure will be the adoption of the official and working language of one of the two statelets as an official EU language. Perhaps it appears different to others.
Leaving that aside, this is a fruitless debate because, as I have shown above, the adoption or non-adoption by the EU of a language as an official language has nothing to do with whether or not the EU recognises a language as being official in any particular country. I see no evidence that the EU has any other policy than recognise as official the languages so recognised by each country.