Cyprus-Forum.com

[GreekIslandGirl]

and gave headlines to back 'expulsion'.

This distortion of yours has already been dealt with .....

Really? You deny the black and white form of issuing these headlines:

This distortion of yours has already been dealt with here, yet as ever you just go on and on and on with no regard for actual reality at all. This is what you do, this is what you have always done here.

The distortion is you constantly trimming away the evidence of the headlines you posted and denying the proof exists.

[GreekIslandGirl]

Here they are again .... trim them if you dare!

Financial Times http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6b4bd41e ... z3yern0TPB

Threat of Schengen expulsion a new EU humiliation for Greeks


Greekreporter.com http://greece.greekreporter.com/2016/01 ... -possible/

Migration Deputy Admits Greece’s Expulsion from Schengen Zone Is Possible

[erolz66]

The distortion is you constantly trimming away the evidence of the headlines you posted and denying the proof exists.

I do no such thing. Those headlines are indeed proof. They are proof of the utter absurdity of your claim that there was no basis what so ever for saying that the EU Commission had threatened Greece with sanctions. That is why I quoted them and they serve that purpose very well. This has all been pointed out and explained perfectly clearly multiple times and yet you just go on and on and on with the same distortions over and over and over. This is what you do. This is what you have always done here.

[GreekIslandGirl]

..They are proof of the utter absurdity of your claim that there was no basis what so ever for saying that the EU Commission had threatened Greece with sanctions.

There you go again.

I don't want a 'basis' of proof from media and Tom, Dick and Harry. I want you to prove YOUR claim that the EU Commission made such a threat.

Stop twisting and admit you made it up!

[erolz66]

I don't want a 'basis' of proof from media and Tom, Dick and Harry. I want you to prove YOUR claim that the EU Commission made such a threat.

That the EU Commission made such a threat is self evident. As it is self evident that in your efforts to try and make out this truth is not true you have engaged in the most blatant distortions and denial of evident fact, straw men arguments, distraction, false assertions and all your usual personal attacks. Same old same old. This is what you do and what you have always done here on this forum.

[GreekIslandGirl]

That the EU Commission made such a threat is self evident.

Self evident? When you couldn't find ANYTHING that made it remotely evident!

Are you accusing the EU Commission of being unable to write it down in English - or slowly admitting you made it up, more likely?

Let me remind you what they did say - explicitly!

President Tusk :
"Let me be clear. Excluding Greece from Schengen solves none of our problems." "What we must do is improve the protection of our external borders, not least here in Greece. This requires more Greek effort, but it also requires more support from EU partners."

And,
"We need to invest in Schengen, not in its collapse."

[Paphitis]

The mere fact that the prospect of expulsion was even discussed is clear enough indication to me what the EU is all about. Yeh, let's cut Greece off like a gangrenous limb and the problem is gone.

[GreekIslandGirl]

That's just it. It was never discussed by the EU Commission. Erolz lies.

Being discussed by anti-Greek propaganda merchants, like stud and erolz, and click-hungry media are the only sources or rumours for an 'expulsion'.

[erolz66]

On and on and on you drone. People are not stupid. Many if not most of the posters here know how you behave here GiG, how you have always behaved here. If only you could see the unsolicited pm's I have had from other users here about your behaviour on this forum.

Your gross and blatant and undeniable distortion as to what report the EU commission were talking about is meticulously documented here cyprus44527.html

You are a joke. I know it, I know explicitly that several other posters here know it and I am in no doubt that the vast majority of posters here know it.

[erolz66]

That's just it. It was never discussed by the EU Commission. Erolz lies.

Under the existing Schengen acquis the EU Council can suspend a member from Schengen for up to 2 years. It can only do this following a Schengen evaluation report on that member that identifies serious deficiencies. The Commission then draws up a plan of what that member needs to do to address these serious deficiencies, which if adopted by the EU Council then places a 3 month time limit on that member to carry out these measure. If the member states fails to do this in the three month period set then the Council can suspend that member from Schengen for up to 2 years.

The EU Commission did produce an evaluation report on Greece. All your lies and distortions and distractions do not change this fact.

That evaluation report on Greece did find serious deficiencies by Greece. All your lies and distortions and distractions do not change this fact.

The EU Commission did adopt the findings of this evaluation report on Greece. All your lies and distortions and distractions do not change this fact.

The EU Commission did make recommendations as to what Greece must do to addresses the serious deficiencies identified. All your lies and distortions and distractions do not change this fact.

The EU Council did adopt these recommendations, starting the 3 month deadline. All your lies and distortions and distractions do not change this fact.

If after three months Greece has still failed to address the serious deficiencies identified in the evaluation report, the EU council can suspend Greece from Schengen for up to 2 years, under current Schengen acquis. All your lies and distortions and distractions do not change this fact.