Nikitas wrote:Confirms wha Ecevit stated clearly and with far fewer words in the 80s to Greek daily Eleftherotypia.
"Turkey wants a federal (confederal) state and has little or no interest in creation of an independent Turk Cypriot mini-state or move towards double enosis.
3. Either of latter two courses would run contrary to basic reason for intervention since, by implication, they would open the door to in- troduction of substantial Greek mainland forces onto island. This would place Turkey in position of having southern ports (and heart- land cities) again endangered or of going to war to take entire island, destroying island’s quasi-independence, and facing prospect of pro- tracted guerilla struggle."
And our Tc "compatriots" see nothing wrong with "quasi independence", and therein lies the substance of our problem.
Surely Greece and Turkey could come to an agreement (monitored by NATO?) as to the number of troops and military installations on the island in the event of a Turkish province being established in the north. Bankrupt Greece is not the threat to Turkey that it used to be. Of course the price would be high for the Turkish Cypriots since the "trnc" would have to shrink a lot to seal the deal. If we accept that, unfortunately, some sort of Turkish entity will remain in the north we should agree to legitimise it in exchange for significant return of territory. We have wasted 41 years "negotiating" with the puppets now the negotiations should be via Greece directly with Turkey.