supporttheunderdog wrote:What the article correctly identifies is that (a) Cyprus would have got independance without the terrorism of Eoka and (b) enosis would not have resulted in Liberation but would have left Cyprus under a facist /military dictatorship.
As i have also commented in the past, I think it woukd have left Cyprus destitute, with any one with any get up and go about them getting up and going, as under Greece Cyprus would end up with a lot less buisiness and employment oppertunities than it has ever had as they would all be in Athens. One only need look ar Rural depopulation in Greece.
eoka in fact blew it, literally when Harding visited. The bombing that marked his visit brought an end before they had started to the serious negotiations which could have lead to home rule. That would have lead to the creation of an assembly which could have been based on one man one vote, no regard to ethnicity/language/religion. It would have allowed for the development of a more secure power base for big Mak. With that assembly in place, and internal stability, something not enjoyed due to conflict within the GSC community, Big Mak could have got a far better deal with independance. He however overplayed his hand as happened in 1963 with the first evil A plan, the acritas plan.
The rest is History.
What you have to understand is that to a large extent, Britain is the one that created EOKA.
They had continuously lied to Cypriots, resulting them to enlist in the British Military and fight the Nazis. Then on top of this, the British refused to accept the cultural links of Cyprus. The Greek National Anthem was banned, the Greek Flag was banned, blue pencils were made illegal, curfews introduced, and of course, they used the TCs for surveillance.