supporttheunderdog wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:miltiades wrote:From the very start it was ESTABLISHED that one sick pilot committed this hideous acts. Personally I don't give a toss if the investigators did or did not follow correct procedures. The victims are the 149 innocent passengers and their bereaved families. Who cares if the correct, according to Paphitis, procedures were followed or not. One mentally unstable sick bastard decided to end his miserable life and that of 149 passengers. To hell with protocol and the nonsense spouted by Paphitis, passengers have a right to demand that a fucking psycho is not in charge of their lives.
The media reported correctly. Paphitis, you are out of order, nobody gives a shit whether the media or the investigators were premature in their announcements. The fact of the matter is that one sick bastard, hoodwinked the system, a system that has to be vigorously tightened, a system that demands and expects absolute safety. Paphitis seems to be more concerned with splitting hairs than the real issue, in that any sick individual can again commit what this sick fucker did.
Well look at it this way Milti. Suppose the airlines so as you suggest, and the pilots disagree and go on international strike.
Then the problem of how you return from Belarus will be all yours.
You will most probably need to take ship. It won't take you 3 hours to return to London but 3 weeks
Since Belarus is landlocked, ship is not an option. Overland Its about 2200 KM. Three or four days leisurely drive, or about 28 hours by train. The old codger is home anyway.
The problem is that with several likely incidents of murder-suicide by air-crew, the airlines and the authorities have to be seen to be doing something, albeit that the number of incidents is small and the percentage chance of being affected is very small indeed, and that there are no foolproof methods of weeding out the lunatics. I think the aircrew would loose a lot of respect among the masses if they want on strike because it was perceived they were against safety measures introduced following this incident, whether or not the safety measures proposed were sensible or not.
However what alternative rational proposals does anyone have, to reduce the risk further?
The airlines are doing something. You are just being led to believe that they are not.
The health and wellbeing of Flight Crew is always a serious concern to an Airline and to the Unions representing pilots.
Medicals do contain a thorough questionnaire, pilots are tested for drugs and medicines regularly. There is not much else that can be done without infringing on other areas and processes.
The Airlines don't need to do a single thing. The safety record speaks for itself. Just because an air crash kills 150 is no reason to introduce fly by night legislation which the Airlines and Unions will not support.
The media and public are barking up the wrong tree. I can think of some serious market driven concerns which are making aviation unsafer. If only people knew or were able to do some research. These concerns will kill a few thousand over the next decade.
All I can say is, choose your airlines wisely. Lufthansa is not one of the Airlines anyone should be worried about.
Neither is Malaysian.