Lordo wrote:unbloodybelievable, anything that happens that is bad must be caused by terggy. is there no end to your stupidity.
Maximus wrote:Lordo wrote:unbloodybelievable, anything that happens that is bad must be caused by terggy. is there no end to your stupidity.
Did you read Davutoglu's strategic depth and zero problems with neighbors doctrine? Now that's stupidity.
Paphitis wrote:
Right now, many peoples in Iraq and Syria are facing the deplorable IS, and whether or not you consider this the fault of America or not, it is important to note that the coalition will try to remedy this. Not only are Iraqis and Syrians facing this gruesome organization, but we too may face them in our own homelands.
I do hope we capture a few of them alive. There are some empty cells at Quantanamo Bay I will have you know and we will like the opportunity to interrogate them.
Garavnoss wrote:It is within the area of your views above that the greatest gulf between us lies, you open with the words "Right Now" and that does suggest that you have adopted the "Politician's Stance" which invariably only considers issues as they ARE at any particular moment.
Garavnoss wrote:Typical of politicians, such a stance provides them with a great deal of flexibility and enables them to stand on one leg one day and another leg the next, we have seen it so many times that it escapes our notice, unless we are very careful.
Garavnoss wrote:There is NO QUESTION (in my view) that the American and British forces are responsible for ALL the disharmony now taking place in the Middle East and other regions, the (now coalition forces) are not doing anyone a service by claiming to be engaged in a process of rectifying the situation in the areas they are focusing on, they are merely trying to contain the "Ogre" that was created when Bush and Blair concocted the excuse to depose the Iraqi president and gain control of the nation's resources, colour it which way you like, those are the basic facts.
Garavnoss wrote:Out of the destruction subsequent to the "Shock and Awe" fiasco, there emerged several warring factions, THE most ferocious of all of them is the IS, there ARE others and I suspect they are being well paid as mercenaries in many cases but, IS has different motives
and represents a rather more difficult force to deal with since, it will not be intimidated by threats, nor bought off with US dollars.
Garavnoss wrote:IS wishes to rid the Middle East of the curse that descended upon it courtesy of the U.S.A. (and others) in the guise of helping those who supposedly lived in fear of their rulers, it sounded like a good ploy but the outcome was not quite as expected.
Garavnoss wrote:The IS are not afraid to die for their cause, they have principles which WE do not understand and their fervour is such that no threat nor force of arms will deter them from reaching their objectives, one of which is to impose "Sharia Law" in their OWN nation.
Garavnoss wrote:Nothing wrong with that, if you don't like it, go and live elsewhere, ultimately they will win for precisely those reasons.
Garavnoss wrote:Guantanamo Bay prison cells (which you mention) are NOT an asset to the Americans, the tortures that were committed there are well documented and also a possible reason for all the uprisings in many areas of the world, IS may well have been influenced by the exposure of such inhumane activities, they may even be in the process of "Fighting Fire with Fire", as the old saying goes.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests