DT. wrote:These actions by this army of lunatics and savages are disgusting. The beheadings, the destructions, the tortures, the burning of victims alive. All belong in another world. Wish someone would press a button and exterminate the entire lot of them.
However I don't understand why some of you cannot condemn these actions and accept at the same time that the killings of millions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The thousands of innocent men, women and children killed while sleeping in Dresden. The innocents murdered in Iraq during the U.S. bombardments and many more are just as deplorable in acts.
One person killed in Syria is equal to one person killed in France. A life is a life, why do so many of you struggle with this?
Agree with your post but the allies were not happy about the carpet bombing of Dresden or the Nuclear attack on Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
Yes sure, some 250,000 people were killed. We know this. No one is happy about it. The civilians did not deserve to die let alone women and small innocent children. We get it.
But neither do the thousands of American, and Australian troops deserve to die. The cost of a large full scale invasion of Japan would possibly cost the lives of just as many allied and enemy troops. Yes up to 250,000, and maybe more even.
Then consider the possibility that this war could last a number of years. How many civilians would be killed from the conventional carpet bombing of Japanese cities. Anywhere up to 2 million. Don't laugh, because these are the possibilities and realistic at that. The Japanese were not going to surrender without the threat of nuclear annihilation.
All of a sudden, the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (and the carpet bombing of Dresden) don't seem such a bad option.
These are the realities that need to be weighed up. Unfortunately, the burden among leaders faced with these realities is enormous and something that can't be reconciled that easily. Your analogy is extremely simplistic.
There were no laser or GPS guided bombs in those days.