Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

:? The idiot can’t even get his quoting right despite having been here for like 10 years!

What a waste of space…

Yes, but I sure get the message across psycho

[Get Real!]

:? The idiot can’t even get his quoting right despite having been here for like 10 years!

What a waste of space…

Yes, but I sure get the message across psycho

Oh I'm sure they're all aware you're a fucking idiot by now...

[miltiades]

:? The idiot can’t even get his quoting right despite having been here for like 10 years!

What a waste of space…

Yes, but I sure get the message across psycho

Oh I'm sure they're all aware you're a fucking idiot by now...

EVERYBODY, EVERYBODY, on this forum knows you are a fucking idiot and a fucking psychopath.
Shall we have a ...poll titled : IS GR A FUCKING PSYCHOPATH ?

[Jerry]

Sounds familiar. Does ROC bullying TC's come to mind? Turkey giving the ROC "a good boot in the backside"

Get it right will you, the first bullying that comes to mind is the sight of TC auxiliary police booting the backsides of Greek Cypriots before independence.

[Lordo]

I am of the opinion that this "POLL" has been compromised by the views of the one who raised it.

In the first instance, the opening invitation suggested that the outcome would be in HIS favour.

The subject matter of the "POLL" has been clouded by events which do not fairly focus on "Courage".

Those who do not agree with the raiser are subjected to scathingly abusive attacks, (they may fear such intimidation).

The raiser has admitted that he even voted in opposition to his own beliefs. (an act of dishonesty which suggests manipulation).

Therefore, due to the above infringements of fair play, I consider the "POLL" of no consequence and invalid.

I would invite members to consider the ground-rules for the presentation of any "POLL", the first of which is "Impartiality"

Post by miltiades » Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:10 pm

I have a confession to make.

On casting my ....vote yesterday I voted.....YES !!

Proof of the manipulation of the "POLL" in question, whilst raising the prospect that he may have voted several "NO's".

Idiot you are ! I voted Yes by mistake you fool. Im a positive man, and made a genuine error which I posted on the thread in question.
This thread is now CLOSED.

how can you make such a mistake, how many glasses had you had.

[Paphitis]

"Incidentally, since you suggest that the "Poll" is now closed, I would point out that "Cowards do not fight", they are usually afraid to, only those who possess a certain degree of "Courage" would be prepared to die for a cause which THEY believe in.

Would you not agree on THAT small point ?.

No I bloody well do NOT agree. Use your loaf man
A mentally deranged gunman walks into a school and indiscriminately shoots and kills children. Is he brave or is he, like ISIS, fucking lunatic.

You again avoid the issue by linking the actions of IS with the question of "Courage", quite a separate subject actually.

Why don't you start your own poll.

No one respects DAESH as having courage as you insinuate. Put it o the test.

I have NEVER indicated any interest in DAESH in any of my comments, however, if they are involved in a struggle (for whatever cause) I would have to concede that they too MUST be equipped with a certain degree of "Courage".

In MY view, any superior force which imposes it's will (or even seeks to) on a lesser force, requires LESS "Courage" than the underdog, the pages of history are littered with classic examples of "The Bully" ending up with a good boot in the backside, the Yanks have had a few in their time and it is MY guess that they are heading for another one.,

I am truly amazed!

You said, that the coalition pilots are cowards. care to rethink this position?

Additionally, let's put to the test who you respect more. Do you really respect an IS Fighter more than a Coalition Pilot?

If you were to have one or the other over for dinner with your family, who would you pick? A Coalition Pilot or an IS cutthroat?

Don't avoid the question now.

Yes let's also put to the test as to who is more courageous. An IS cutthroat, or a Coalition Pilot who could be shot down and fall into the hands of IS who will probably burn the Pilot alive. What a way to go. Better to suicide as far as I am concerned and I am sure many pilots would prefer that option if they can't evade capture.

[Get Real!]

You said, that the coalition pilots are cowards. care to rethink this position?

Do you eat manure for breakfast?

NOBODY can possibly be that stupid!

[Paphitis]

You said, that the coalition pilots are cowards. care to rethink this position?

Do you eat manure for breakfast?

NOBODY can possibly be that stupid!

Are you a poof?

Don't blame me for posing questions you can't answer because you're an nincompoop.

Start cooking that Souvla because I have a feeling you would rather USAF Pilots over for dinner than Jihadi John!

Oh I would love to be a fly on the wall.

[Garavnoss]

I am truly amazed!

You said, that the coalition pilots are cowards. care to rethink this position?

In all honesty, I cannot recall ever indicating such a direct slur on their "Courage", perhaps I alluded to the fact that I considered their actions "Cowardly" on account of their invulnerable position whilst delivering bombs upon targets which are ill-equipped in defend themselves from such aerial bombardments., That situation might qualify for such a view.

I think the most "Courageous" action these pilots take (on current bombing raids mind) is to climb into the aircraft and place their complete confidence in the technology and servicing of their flying "Death Machines".

Unless they are airborne to face a likewise equipped fighter plane, I think it would be fair to assume that they have little to fear in the circumstance of merely going out on a bombing raid, knowing that they will meet with little resistance.

THAT sounds a little more in line with MY thoughts, perhaps you know different, I would be pleased to know............ thanks.

[Paphitis]

I am truly amazed!

You said, that the coalition pilots are cowards. care to rethink this position?

In all honesty, I cannot recall ever indicating such a direct slur on their "Courage", perhaps I alluded to the fact that I considered their actions "Cowardly" on account of their invulnerable position whilst delivering bombs upon targets which are ill-equipped in defend themselves from such aerial bombardments., That situation might qualify for such a view.

I think the most "Courageous" action these pilots take (on current bombing raids mind) is to climb into the aircraft and place their complete confidence in the technology and servicing of their flying "Death Machines".

Unless they are airborne to face a likewise equipped fighter plane, I think it would be fair to assume that they have little to fear in the circumstance of merely going out on a bombing raid, knowing that they will meet with little resistance.

THAT sounds a little more in line with MY thoughts, perhaps you know different, I would be pleased to know............ thanks.

I wouldn't say they are invulnerable. Every aircraft is vulnerable when it flies over enemy controlled territory. And further to this the Pilots will pay with their life should they be downed and the death that awaits them is gruesome unless they take their life with their own hand which no doubt would have to be an option under the circumstances.

I do know that Australian Pilots carry suicide pills - standard issue. They could also use their Glock.

And you are completely wrong. If our weapons are superior and give us an advantage, then we will use them. Really sorry, but we are not in the business of evening up the odds so that people like you can admire their courage.