Cyprus-Forum.com

[Garavnoss]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You obviously went in for some ...treatment !!!

Actually, YOU were the subject of a very interesting "After Dinner" conversation, your outbursts were viewed by a few influential members of a rather exclusive gentlemen's club.

The general consensus of opinion (we conducted a "Poll") was a unanimous condemnation of your behaviour and total agreement that there is something seriously wrong with your mental state..............( I didn't vote, I knew what the result would be)

[miltiades]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You obviously went in for some ...treatment !!!

Actually, YOU were the subject of a very interesting "After Dinner" conversation, your outbursts were viewed by a few influential members of a rather exclusive gentlemen's club.

The general consensus of opinion (we conducted a "Poll") was a unanimous condemnation of your behaviour and total agreement that there is something seriously wrong with your mental state..............( I didn't vote, I knew what the result would be)

I reiterate, anyone who supports the savages calling them selves isis , deserves my utter contempt. Do you understand this ??

[Garavnoss]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You obviously went in for some ...treatment !!!

Actually, YOU were the subject of a very interesting "After Dinner" conversation, your outbursts were viewed by a few influential members of a rather exclusive gentlemen's club.

The general consensus of opinion (we conducted a "Poll") was a unanimous condemnation of your behaviour and total agreement that there is something seriously wrong with your mental state..............( I didn't vote, I knew what the result would be)

I reiterate, anyone who supports the savages calling them selves isis , deserves my utter contempt. Do you understand this ??

Not really, since your "Slanging Matches" (which you consider debates) are a worthless contribution to ANY discussion.

I would much prefer to debate on the reasons for why IS suddenly emerged, who (or what) is responsible for the emergence ?.

What are the objectives and how do they compare with the objectives of other forces in their homeland (and other regions ?).

Would THEIR society (culture) be superior to OURS ?, (bearing in mind the shocking state WE are in).

Would it not be a good idea to allow them to form their own culture, just to see how well it would work ?. if it became a threat to any other nation, then think about bombing raids and military campaigns..... up to then ,leave the people alone and they will leave us alone , or, to put it bluntly, "Mind your own business".

[Paphitis]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You were about to answer the question about who you would like to prevail! So far you have been avoiding my questions.

Do you want DAESH or the ISF/Peshmerga to prevail?

[Garavnoss]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You were about to answer the question about who you would like to prevail! So far you have been avoiding my questions.

Do you want DAESH or the ISF/Peshmerga to prevail?

I don't think it quite fair of you to suggest that I have been avoiding your questions, I think I have been quite explicit in my responses and can see from yours that you are inclined to dissect mine in order to press your points.

Overall, I can appreciate that there is a vast gulf between us as far as this (and other) topic/s is/are concerned.

However, there is never room for insult and abuse when two gentlemen are exchanging views, howsoever different they may be.

As to your question regarding my preference in the matter of IS v Allied forces, I would like to make it quite clear that I am not in favour of either side of the conflict, I insist that there are terrible atrocities committed by both forces and furthermore, it is quite understandable that the degree of inhuman behaviour will plumb new depths as each side retaliates to the actions of the other.

I WOULD have much preferred that the Middle Eastern (and other) regions were left to conduct their own affairs in their own ways and am still of the same opinion, regardless of what we are informed of by corrupt political leaders (proven so) and in the light of those submissions, I can only incline my preference in one direction, NOT as a matter of which side should overcome the other but,
I would like to see what the outcome would be if a "Caliphate" was founded in an area WHERE THE PEOPLE WOULD ACCEPT IT and not subject to the approval of the Western (and other) powers.

Such a situation might solve a lot of the problems (created by the Western etc) and at the same time allow us to observe whether or not such a governance would succeed.

This does NOT mean that I am a Jihadist nor that I favour the idea of people having their heads chopped off etc, I think it is a view that is worthy of consideration, others may disagree, that is their prerogative.

In closing, the term DAESH is a purposely configured insult to IS, they do not like it so WHY use it ?.

[miltiades]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You were about to answer the question about who you would like to prevail! So far you have been avoiding my questions.

Do you want DAESH or the ISF/Peshmerga to prevail?

I don't think it quite fair of you to suggest that I have been avoiding your questions, I think I have been quite explicit in my responses and can see from yours that you are inclined to dissect mine in order to press your points.

Overall, I can appreciate that there is a vast gulf between us as far as this (and other) topic/s is/are concerned.

However, there is never room for insult and abuse when two gentlemen are exchanging views, howsoever different they may be.

As to your question regarding my preference in the matter of IS v Allied forces, I would like to make it quite clear that I am not in favour of either side of the conflict, I insist that there are terrible atrocities committed by both forces and furthermore, it is quite understandable that the degree of inhuman behaviour will plumb new depths as each side retaliates to the actions of the other.

I WOULD have much preferred that the Middle Eastern (and other) regions were left to conduct their own affairs in their own ways and am still of the same opinion, regardless of what we are informed of by corrupt political leaders (proven so) and in the light of those submissions, I can only incline my preference in one direction, NOT as a matter of which side should overcome the other but,
I would like to see what the outcome would be if a "Caliphate" was founded in an area WHERE THE PEOPLE WOULD ACCEPT IT and not subject to the approval of the Western (and other) powers.

Such a situation might solve a lot of the problems (created by the Western etc) and at the same time allow us to observe whether or not such a governance would succeed.

This does NOT mean that I am a Jihadist nor that I favour the idea of people having their heads chopped off etc, I think it is a view that is worthy of consideration, others may disagree, that is their prerogative.

In closing, the term DAESH is a purposely configured insult to IS, they do not like it so WHY use it ?.

Still posting a load of diarrhoea !!! You are a first class Idiot, live with it stupid, from me you will always get what you deserve. Fuck off yo Syria, join your heroes, you stupid man/ woman/ IT

[Garavnoss]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You were about to answer the question about who you would like to prevail! So far you have been avoiding my questions.

Do you want DAESH or the ISF/Peshmerga to prevail?

I don't think it quite fair of you to suggest that I have been avoiding your questions, I think I have been quite explicit in my responses and can see from yours that you are inclined to dissect mine in order to press your points.

Overall, I can appreciate that there is a vast gulf between us as far as this (and other) topic/s is/are concerned.

However, there is never room for insult and abuse when two gentlemen are exchanging views, howsoever different they may be.

As to your question regarding my preference in the matter of IS v Allied forces, I would like to make it quite clear that I am not in favour of either side of the conflict, I insist that there are terrible atrocities committed by both forces and furthermore, it is quite understandable that the degree of inhuman behaviour will plumb new depths as each side retaliates to the actions of the other.

I WOULD have much preferred that the Middle Eastern (and other) regions were left to conduct their own affairs in their own ways and am still of the same opinion, regardless of what we are informed of by corrupt political leaders (proven so) and in the light of those submissions, I can only incline my preference in one direction, NOT as a matter of which side should overcome the other but,
I would like to see what the outcome would be if a "Caliphate" was founded in an area WHERE THE PEOPLE WOULD ACCEPT IT and not subject to the approval of the Western (and other) powers.

Such a situation might solve a lot of the problems (created by the Western etc) and at the same time allow us to observe whether or not such a governance would succeed.

This does NOT mean that I am a Jihadist nor that I favour the idea of people having their heads chopped off etc, I think it is a view that is worthy of consideration, others may disagree, that is their prerogative.

In closing, the term DAESH is a purposely configured insult to IS, they do not like it so WHY use it ?.

Still posting a load of diarrhoea !!! You are a first class Idiot, live with it stupid, from me you will always get what you deserve. Fuck off yo Syria, join your heroes, you stupid man/ woman/ IT

It is perfectly obvious that you are incapable of understanding the basics of an intelligent exchange between two parties, your presence is an embarrassment in a civilized debate and your knowledge of the subject in which we are engaged is abysmal, I am NOT going to be dragged into the gutter (where you belong) nor engage you in a slanging match since I would be out of my depth and you would beat me every time, in fact, I would put you above every member on this forum in terms of your crudeness, God (or Allah) only knows what class of a woman would have anything to do with a man like you, certainly you would be a poor guest at ANY social gathering, your grasp of the social graces MUST be on a par with your disgusting language and capacity to insult.

You are (in my considered opinion) a man to be pitied for your cowardly attacks on the status of those you can never hope to emulate at any respectable level.

You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself but, I doubt if you even know the meaning of shame......you disgust me.

[miltiades]

Paphitis, I have been away for a couple of days, now where were we ?.

You were about to answer the question about who you would like to prevail! So far you have been avoiding my questions.

Do you want DAESH or the ISF/Peshmerga to prevail?

I don't think it quite fair of you to suggest that I have been avoiding your questions, I think I have been quite explicit in my responses and can see from yours that you are inclined to dissect mine in order to press your points.

Overall, I can appreciate that there is a vast gulf between us as far as this (and other) topic/s is/are concerned.

However, there is never room for insult and abuse when two gentlemen are exchanging views, howsoever different they may be.

As to your question regarding my preference in the matter of IS v Allied forces, I would like to make it quite clear that I am not in favour of either side of the conflict, I insist that there are terrible atrocities committed by both forces and furthermore, it is quite understandable that the degree of inhuman behaviour will plumb new depths as each side retaliates to the actions of the other.

I WOULD have much preferred that the Middle Eastern (and other) regions were left to conduct their own affairs in their own ways and am still of the same opinion, regardless of what we are informed of by corrupt political leaders (proven so) and in the light of those submissions, I can only incline my preference in one direction, NOT as a matter of which side should overcome the other but,
I would like to see what the outcome would be if a "Caliphate" was founded in an area WHERE THE PEOPLE WOULD ACCEPT IT and not subject to the approval of the Western (and other) powers.

Such a situation might solve a lot of the problems (created by the Western etc) and at the same time allow us to observe whether or not such a governance would succeed.

This does NOT mean that I am a Jihadist nor that I favour the idea of people having their heads chopped off etc, I think it is a view that is worthy of consideration, others may disagree, that is their prerogative.

In closing, the term DAESH is a purposely configured insult to IS, they do not like it so WHY use it ?.

Still posting a load of diarrhoea !!! You are a first class Idiot, live with it stupid, from me you will always get what you deserve. Fuck off yo Syria, join your heroes, you stupid man/ woman/ IT

It is perfectly obvious that you are incapable of understanding the basics of an intelligent exchange between two parties, your presence is an embarrassment in a civilized debate and your knowledge of the subject in which we are engaged is abysmal, I am NOT going to be dragged into the gutter (where you belong) nor engage you in a slanging match since I would be out of my depth and you would beat me every time, in fact, I would put you above every member on this forum in terms of your crudeness, God (or Allah) only knows what class of a woman would have anything to do with a man like you, certainly you would be a poor guest at ANY social gathering, your grasp of the social graces MUST be on a par with your disgusting language and capacity to insult.

You are (in my considered opinion) a man to be pitied for your cowardly attacks on the status of those you can never hope to emulate at any respectable level.

You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself but, I doubt if you even know the meaning of shame......you disgust me.

Im perfectly well qualified to enter a "debate" in a civil eloquent manner. You do not deserve an intelligent civil "debate" in view of your sickening views such as this one. "This does NOT mean that I am a Jihadist nor that I favour the idea of people having their heads chopped off etc, I think it is a view that is worthy of consideration, others may disagree, that is their prerogative"
Or this " I am not in favour of either side of the conflict, I insist that there are terrible atrocities committed by both forces and furthermore, it is quite understandable that the degree of inhuman behaviour will plumb new depths as each side retaliates to the actions of the other."

You are a misguided individual with shallow and perverted convictions developed and driven entirely by your insatiable hatred for America. You are not worthy of a civil interaction since I find your views nauseating, disgusting and conclusively sick.

[Lordo]

may i suggest you double the medication.

[miltiades]

may i suggest you double the medication.

Is this what you do, Stupid !