Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

Oh I wouldn't give up hope on that one old chap, what you lack in youth and physical fitness you adequately compensate for in your undying love for the American military and political machinations and your lust for the blood of their enemies.

Perhaps you could be a sniper or better still, one who sits in front of a screen and directs guided missiles to targets which kill and maim innocent civilians and young children, such a position is a very safe one, usually many miles from the front, you might even meet up with the likes of Prince Harry (or other dignitaries you can suck up to).

You could (if all else fails) compose the reports that are released to the press (and media) which covers up those atrocities which are really attributable to the actions of the allied forces (but are blamed on the enemy) for the benefit of the "Folks back home".

Your communication skills coupled with your dexterity with the keyboard could even be seen as an asset to the allied forces, I think you have a very good chance of enrolment but would advise you to curb your language a little, you would hardly be invited to take a "Commissioned Officer's Cadre Course" if you continued with it.

But once again, don't give up hope, stranger things have happened, we hear about them every day.[/quote]

Nothing wrong with being a sniper. They get rid of a lot of trash, save the lives of our soldiers and they are so sharp and clinical! I reckon they are artists and there is a lot of concentration involved right down to the breathing.

Nothing wrong with with firing smart missiles either. They usually hit the intended target.

There is a lot of satisfaction in the knowledge that your deeds save x number of lives. It's a bit like being a doctor really!

Just think of it as doing God's work.[/quote]


It would be foolhardy to disagree with your views but, much would depend upon which side of the fence you were sitting on.[/quote]

Why that should be an easy question to answer.

One side is persecuting the defenceless minorities of other faiths by striking at their necks, whilst the other side is trying to stop this.

Which side are you on?[/quote]


A very easy question to answer, as always, I am on the side of the righteous!...., Only the Almighty is qualified to determine which are acting in accordance with their faith but, in the absence of the good Lord's presence, I am sure Miltiades and yourself are NOT wholly capable of delivering a fair judgement, you are both far too bloodthirsty and Miltiades is far too emotional.[/quote]

Not wishing to insult anyone's stupid faith, its suffice to say that the so called almighty is a figment of medieval mans imagination. The savages are no more religious than I'm, and I'm def not a brainwashed religious nut as you appear to be. May your imaginary god help you overcome your stupidity. There you are, I can even be civil to idiots!!

[Garavnoss]

I have as much respect for your views as I would have for the views of a paedophile on the merits of paedophilia.

May I enquire as to why you seem so preoccupied with the subject of "Paedophilia" ?, your constant references to it are rather odd and could be construed as a suggestion that you might have a problem which you are unable to deal with.

If you are in any way troubled with abnormal feelings, seek help man, there are expert counsellors who deal specifically with such problems, they are non-judgemental and are to be relied upon for their discretion.

Friendly advice I assure you, but you DO often mention the subject and I am NOT amused by your alluding to the subject (quite often) when communicating with me.

Another apology perhaps ?. (that'll be 2 you owe me)

[Paphitis]

I have as much respect for your views as I would have for the views of a paedophile on the merits of paedophilia.

May I enquire as to why you seem so preoccupied with the subject of "Paedophilia" ?, your constant references to it are rather odd and could be construed as a suggestion that you might have a problem which you are unable to deal with.

If you are in any way troubled with abnormal feelings, seek help man, there are expert counsellors who deal specifically with such problems, they are non-judgemental and are to be relied upon for their discretion.

Friendly advice I assure you, but you DO often mention the subject and I am NOT amused by your alluding to the subject (quite often) when communicating with me.

Another apology perhaps ?.

You can go back to the question I posed and do try to stand by your convictions and be honest in your support for either the coalition or DAESH.

Whose side are you on?

[Paphitis]

I have as much respect for your views as I would have for the views of a paedophile on the merits of paedophilia.

May I enquire as to why you seem so preoccupied with the subject of "Paedophilia" ?, your constant references to it are rather odd and could be construed as a suggestion that you might have a problem which you are unable to deal with.

If you are in any way troubled with abnormal feelings, seek help man, there are expert counsellors who deal specifically with such problems, they are non-judgemental and are to be relied upon for their discretion.

Friendly advice I assure you, but you DO often mention the subject and I am NOT amused by your alluding to the subject (quite often) when communicating with me.

Another apology perhaps ?. (that'll be 2 you owe me)

Let's be frank with each other.

There are only 2 options. The fact you seem hellbent on avoiding this simple question, could mean one of 2 things. Either, you find DAESH reprehensible and support the coalition which might be difficult for you to admit to, or you do in fact have so much hatred for the West and because if your blinding hatred you support DAESH and its crimes against the Iraqi and Syrian people.

Either way, I would respect you more if you had the fortitude and honesty to reveal in black and white exactly what your position is. The fact that you avoid the question is an indication of your lack of courage. It could be a sign of your cowardice be which I would not be able to accuse you of even if your came out and admitted that you support DAESH.

[Garavnoss]

To Paphitis :-


As one idiot to another (your words not mine) I would have to reply that I do not in any way form an alliance with nor glorify the actions of either side of the conflict.

If the nature of your enquiry is to establish which side of the said conflict I feel is wholly responsible for the emergence of IS (I do not like DAESH as it is disrespectful), then I am quite prepared to submit that I blame Bush, Blair, (and those that allied to them) in the upheavals of the Middle East.

THAT has always been my stance on the issues, others might disagree and that is their right but, I do not think insult and bad language should be ANY part of the discussion on the subject, such behaviour merely smacks of immaturity and inability to communicate in a civilized manner, not very nice in case young impressionable people may be viewing.

As to atrocities (committed by either side) OF COURSE I am not in favour of them.

[Garavnoss]

Let's be frank with each other.

There are only 2 options. The fact you seem hellbent on avoiding this simple question, could mean one of 2 things. Either, you find DAESH reprehensible and support the coalition which might be difficult for you to admit to, or you do in fact have so much hatred for the West and because if your blinding hatred you support DAESH and its crimes against the Iraqi and Syrian people.

Either way, I would respect you more if you had the fortitude and honesty to reveal in black and white exactly what your position is. The fact that you avoid the question is an indication of your lack of courage.

Our posts crossed here, perhaps we could re-adjust and put the matter right.

[Paphitis]

To Paphitis :-


As one idiot to another (your words not mine) I would have to reply that I do not in any way form an alliance with nor glorify the actions of either side of the conflict.

If the nature of your enquiry is to establish which side of the said conflict I feel is wholly responsible for the emergence of IS (I do not like DAESH as it is disrespectful), then I am quite prepared to submit that I blame Bush, Blair, (and those that allied to them) in the upheavals of the Middle East.

THAT has always been my stance on the issues, others might disagree and that is their right but, I do not think insult and bad language should be ANY part of the discussion on the subject, such behaviour merely smacks of immaturity and inability to communicate in a civilized manner, not very nice in case young impressionable people may be viewing.

As to atrocities (committed by either side) OF COURSE I am not in favour of them.

When did I call you an idiot? And I will not take kindly to be called an idiot. I believe you owe me an apology. Now, you are behaving in the same manner as what you accuse Miltiades of, as well as display your lack of courage. Stand up for what you believe in.

It's a very nice try at derailment but let's get back on track.

No, I did not ask you who you think is responsible for the emergence of DAESH and nor does it make any difference because no one could foresee its emergence to begin with. I am also sure that the Americans would not withdraw from Iraq if they knew at the time that the ISF will lose control to this Jihadist organization.

The nature of my enquiry is to establish exactly where you stand. Who would you prefer to prevail?

Whose side are you on in this conflict? DAESH OR ISF/Peshmerga/Kurds/Coalition

The USA is only but one country in this coalition.

[Garavnoss]

There you are, I can even be civil to idiots!!

The final comment on one of your previous posts which, would naturally be read as inclusive of myself.

I've forgotten how to stick my tongue out and say "Mer !"

[Paphitis]

There you are, I can even be civil to idiots!!

The final comment on one of your previous posts which, would naturally be read as inclusive of myself.

I've forgotten how to stick my tongue out and say "Mer !"

Wrong!

That was Milti's comment! It was not mine at all.

Milti messed up his quotations as per usual. As I said, you owe me an apology for this slander and for calling me an idiot.
You should get your facts right before making such accusations.

AND, you can get back to the question as well.

[Garavnoss]

There you are, I can even be civil to idiots!!

The final comment on one of your previous posts which, would naturally be read as inclusive of myself.

I've forgotten how to stick my tongue out and say "Mer !"

Wrong!

That was Milti's comment! It was not mine at all.

Milti messed up his quotations as per usual. As I said, you owe me an apology for this slander and for calling me an idiot.
You should get your facts right before making such accusations.

AND, you can get back to the question as well.

Under the circumstances I of course apologize, I acted in retaliation and should have known better I'm sorry for the offence.

The ONLY defence I can offer is a rather amusing one (if I may say so), the comments which ended with the expression I found offensive, contained NO foul language and, quite naturally I did not associate them with Miltiades !. (there is a lesson here).

I also withdraw my "Mer !" and trust you will forgive my slight upon you.

NOW, where were we, or have we done ?. (someone is a little too fast on the trigger here).